Lead Director = Chief Process Leader
By Eve Tahmincioglu

In the The CEO’S Boss:  Tough Love in the Boardroom published in 2010, Columbia Business School management professor William Klepper, predicted that “lead independent directors will become the chief process leaders of their board.”

So what happened?

I contacted Klepper recently to get his take on the lead director-and-CEO relationship given our package for this issue is focused on “CEO Maintenance.”

The lead director, he says, should play a key role in CEO maintenance and essentially be the chief process officer.

The lead independent director is the one who keeps the lines of communication open with CEO, giving them feedback and support for the things they need to do to be more effective, he explains.

The lead director, he continues, “is the articulator between the board and the CEO, particularly if the CEO is the chairperson.  The maintenance of the CEO is dependent on maintaining a viable board-CEO partnership.”

The independent board role has been mushrooming, in part because of the Dodd-Frank Act that mandated companies disclose whether or not they have such a director if the firms have a combined CEO and chairman.

Among the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 23 companies had a lead director, according to research from Sidley Austin LLP. The law firm found that among the most common responsibilities was that the director serve “as a liaison between the chair and the independent directors.”

As for Klepper’s prediction that the role would become more process-oriented, he says, it’s “a work in progress, but the role is being more clearly defined and justified as the board articulator, the one who makes sure the dialogue between the boardroom and C-suite is honest, transparent and strong.”

To that end, our CEO maintenance package tackles a host of issues including one piece, “Some Top Dogs Need Watchdogs,” in which Maureen Milford examines how boards are being pushed to establish more CEO oversight procedures. Caren Kenney, executive director of Premier Executive Leadership at Johnson & Johnson Human Performance Institute, writes about CEO work-life balance and the board’s role in ensuring executive wellbeing. And the chairman of Nokia, Risto Siilasmaa, offers advice on how directors can make sure their CEOs are staying on top of the latest innovations.

I’d love to hear your thoughts about this issue, or any topics you’d like us to cover. You can reach me at eve@directorsandboards.com.

 


Issue: 
2018 Fourth Quarter

Other related articles

  • Comp Committees Should Broaden Tech-Ethics Scope
    Published April 09, 2019
    By Stephen Charlebois and Ross Perry
    A Focus on AI and Machine Learning.Across all industries, technology has become a key driver of growth and profitability for many organizations. Old industrial companies have been replaced by those wi ...
  • Boards Need to Push ESG Out of Silos
    Published April 09, 2019
    By Dennis T. Whalen and Jose R. Rodriguez
    Prioritizing environmental, social and governance matters requires sustained effort.Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues are increasingly factored into corporate performance.Many investo ...
  • Directors’ Private Emails May Not Stay Private
    Published April 09, 2019
    By Doug Raymond
    A recent Papa John’s ruling shines light on how electronic messages thought to be private could end up as evidence.A ruling delivered by an influential court in a case involving pizza chain Papa Joh ...
  • 5 Core Principles of AI Ethics
    Published April 09, 2019
    By Eve Tahmincioglu
    The UK provides an artificial intelligence code of ethics that could be a framework for countries around the globe.The UK government published a report last year on the ethics of artificial intelligen ...