The Fuzzy Line Between the Board and Management
By Directors and Boards

Don’t expect anything to clear up anytime soon.

The COVID-19 pandemic created the need for many boards to meet weekly, if not daily, and engage with management in a more hands-on way.

But there has always been a governance best practice to have “noses in, fingers out.” In other words, boards should advise management but should not do management’s job for them.

Once the pandemic is over, will directors be able to pull their fingers out? And should they?

Pat McGurn, head of strategic research & analysis and special counsel for Institutional Shareholder Services, says he thinks this isn’t only a 2020 issue, but one that’s been building over time.

“I think when it comes to investors’ views of boards of directors, the old paradigm of noses in and fingers out has gotten significantly fuzzier in recent years,” he says. “And that predated the pandemic. But the pandemic has really pushed it even further out of line, given the expectations of investors. Today it’s ears, eyes and noses all in and fingers out mostly, but not entirely, with issues of risk, reputation and resiliency.”

Charisse R. Lillie, a director of Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, PECO and Independence Health Group, Inc., says Caremark claims that can bring personal liability to directors are another reason boards are leaning in and asking for more information around risk. However, she says, directors need to “police themselves” when it comes to crossing the line.

“We have had situations on my boards where there has been some concern about the board getting too close to the fuzzy line, but it hasn’t been around COVID,” Lillie says. “And in each of those instances, I’ve really been impressed with how management has been willing to say, ‘We think we are giving you the amount of information you need,’ but really to say, ‘back off’ — in a nice way.”

Lillie adds that the board and management both have a responsibility to “speak truth to power” in their own relationships. That communication was enhanced during the crises of 2020 as robust management reports were circulated to the board farther in advance of meetings so directors could digest the material and didn’t have to have it read to them. Real discussion had the chance to take root in meetings.

These insightful discussions will need to continue as the board is being asked, particularly by investors, to examine new issues of human capital; employee health and safety; gender, racial and ethnic diversity; climate change and cybersecurity.

“I guess my advice would be to embrace the fuzzy line between board and management as a new normal,” McGurn says. “I don’t think that we’re going back to the way that things were before.”

Other related articles

  • Five Ways to Combat Board Groupthink
    Published May 18, 2022
    By Sharda Cherwoo and Shiva Rajgopal
    Effective boards need contrarians and forward thinkersGroup think is one of the greatest challenges facing corporate boards The tendency among decision makers to go along with the seeming consensus vi ...
  • One Wild Month for Elon Musk, Twitter and Tesla
    Published May 02, 2022
    By Bill Hayes
    Share purchases board seats poison pillsoh mynbspIf the saga of Elon Musks quest for Twitter was a rollercoaster it would rank among Six Flags finestnbspIn less than 30 days time Musk went from buying ...
  • More Gender Diversity Needed on Corporate Boards
    Published April 26, 2022
    By Bill Hayes
    Lack of women is especially apparent at the Csuite levelIn February 2022 Jennifer Reynolds officially became the CEO of Women Corporate Directors an organization touted as the worlds largest membershi ...
  • CEO Pay Records a Major Increase in 2021
    Published April 25, 2022
    By Bill Hayes
    Report finds bonus payouts bolstering CEO financial performancenbspAccording to early proxy filers 2021 was a bounceback year for CEOs with total pay recording an uptick of 19 and bonus payouts up nea ...