Elizabeth Warren’s Accountable Capitalism Act
By Eve Tahmincioglu

Delaware’s supreme court chief justice sees merit in calling for employee representation in the boardroom and ESG disclosure for all large companies — public and private. 

Last year, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who is also running for president, introduced the Accountable Capitalism Act, calling for a host of requirements including “substantial” employee representation on corporate boards; environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure; and an obligation for company directors to consider the interests of all corporate stakeholders, not just those who hold stock.

Leo Strine, Delaware supreme court chief justice, weighs in on whether Warren’s bill will help move the inequality needle.

“One of the most interesting things about the bill is that she actually deals with the power and purpose issue very explicitly by requiring that a segment of the board be elected by the workers,” he explains.

Strine says he finds it humorous when people call proposals like this “radical,” or “almost like communism” given that such systems are working in other nations, “places where really wealthy people look to buy their cars and their watches.” Germany, he points out, has labor representatives on boards and the country “has a pretty kick-butt economy. Scandinavia has one of the other better functioning economies in the world and they have a higher level of labor participation. In the U.S. whether this is realistic, that’s for others to decide.”

In the UK, he notes, the new corporate governance code is going in that direction. “You either have to have a director elected by the workers, one who is specifically charged with having the perspective of the workers and caring about their best interest, or you have to form a board committee focused on employee welfare.”

That concept may be less fundamental than Warren’s bill, he says, “but you could see that being achievable in the U.S.”

All these options should be part of a larger transatlantic conversation, he continues, “because the same concerns about whether the market system is working for all, in some ways, led to the election result here and are behind things like Brexit. There has been a real change in gain-sharing between the haves and the workers and that’s pushing these pressures for changes.”

Warren’s focus on social-responsibility disclosure is also useful, Strine explains, but he believes it should extend to institutional investors.

“It’s unrealistic to just focus on the directors. We shouldn’t just have the directors in the companies talking about social responsibility. The institutional investors should be talking about how they take these factors into account.”

Another worthwhile component of her bill, he adds, is that ESG disclosure is focused on the size of the company, not whether the firm is publicly traded.

Given that the ultimate goal is to encourage companies not to pollute, mistreat employees, use child labor or thwart consumer rights, he says, whether a company is publicly traded or not shouldn’t matter.

“If we’re going to go to ESG disclosure, we don’t want to create another incentive for companies to go private and not be public,” he stresses.

The growing trend by companies to bypass the public route, he maintains, may be narrowing the window into the U.S. economy, “because when you don’t have as many public companies as a percentage of your economy, what you actually know about what’s going on in your economy is less.”

 


Issue: 
2019 Second Quarter

Other related articles

  • ESG Lessons from S&P’s Facebook Smackdown
    Published July 31, 2019
    By Eve Tahmincioglu
    The SampP 500 ESG environmental social and governance Index lost a few familiar names during its annual rebalancing including Wells Fargo Oracle and IBM But the one that made the most news and the big ...
  • How Well Do You Really Know the Shareholders You Represent?
    Published July 31, 2019
    By David Shaw
    A few years back I was at a nonbusiness cocktail party chatting with someone I had just met It was a great conversation as I recall until I learned that he was a board member of a company in which I h ...
  • The Runaway CEO Gravy Train
    Published July 31, 2019
    By Robert H. Rock
    Forty years ago Directors amp Boards posited the question Is Any CEO Worth 1 Million Today almost all CEOs are apparently worth 1 million often 1 million a monthAs our nation struggles to come to gri ...
  • Weighing ESG Against Directors’ Fiduciary Duty
    Published July 31, 2019
    By Doug Raymond
    A focus on environmental social and governance benefits should be framednbspby the lens of business benefitsThe directors of a Delaware corporation have a fiduciary duty to manage the corporation in g ...