Directors to Watch: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Executive Pay: Boards Are Testing the Waters
By Margaret Hylas
Companies are increasing their efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). One visible way some companies are showing their commitment is by linking DEI progress to executive pay.
In aggregate, 28% of the S&P 500 mention incorporating DEI in executive pay considerations, but these companies have moved cautiously. Our just-released study of S&P 500 company practices (from proxies filed June 2020 through May 2021) shows that only a small portion (five companies) included full detail about what was being measured and how it tied back to pay design. Another 10 had one of the two — either a specific goal without clear detail on the design mechanics or very clear tieback to design mechanics without a clear target. 
The majority of companies mentioned DEI as a broad factor that affects incentive payouts without making the goals themselves clear in the disclosure. As an example, a company might say, “20% of the annual bonus is based on individual performance,” which includes “creating a diverse and inclusive community” among the imperatives. Boards at companies using discretion may still communicate explicit weighting or goals to their executives, but we know only what they revealed in proxies.
These statistics suggest that boards are taking the time to learn by experimenting with various approaches. As with any other new metric, a board should craft DEI metrics to reflect the company’s context and priorities and to complement existing incentive measures.
Compensation is not the only way for boards to hold executives accountable for DEI. Decisions on succession, leadership development and simply the amount of attention at meetings with management can promote change with fewer of the unintended consequences that can come from using incentive pay.
Accordingly, adopting DEI in incentive pay should never be a single decision. Boards do better with a process, beginning with elevating the issues internally and externally, clarifying goals and trying out DEI informally in pay. Only then is it appropriate to proceed to explicit weighting and goals.

Other related articles

  • Going Beyond the Surface: The Strategic Human Capital Management Opportunity for Boards
    Published January 19, 2022
    By Blair Jones
    Three questions to deepen the conversation around HCMnbspHuman capital management HCM is now a frontandcenter issue for boards Longterm success increasingly depends on attracting retaining and engagin ...
  • Top 5 Compensation Committee Priorities for 2022
    Published January 12, 2022
    By Eric Hoskin and Daniel Laddin
    In the second half of 2021 the market for talent at almost all levels of the organization was red hot with increased levels of turnover and challenges in attracting new staff Companies across most ind ...
  • How boards of directors can mitigate 3 pressing risks entering 2022
    Published December 15, 2021
    By John Brackett
    What boards of directors can do to mitigate risks involving cybersecurity talent recruitment and retention and compliance as the calendar flips to 2022Risks to businesses are evolving so fluidly that ...
  • RSM US Middle Market Business Index
    Published December 09, 2021
    A new Middle Market Business Index special report from RSM US LLP states that the growing importance of environmental social and governance ESG issues has reached an inflection point in the middle mar ...