Corporate Governance at Mid-Market Companies
By April Hall

Survey finds most companies have independent chairs, and a rise in dual-class stock structures

A new survey of mid-market public companies sheds light on a host of corporate governance practices, from board size to stockholder activity.

The study, by law firm Benesch, looked at companies with market caps ranging between $200 million and $1.50 billion.

Here are some of the findings:

Classes of Stock: Public companies maintaining dual classes of stock have increased, according to other governance reports, but Benesch found the mid-market companies they surveyed were not following that.

Board size: Among the companies surveyed, 85% of the companies have a board of directors with seven or more members; 69% of the boards have between seven and nine directors.

Frequency of director elections: When looking at all the surveyed companies’ boards of directors, the companies are roughly split 50-50 as to whether directors are elected annually or on a staggered basis. More specifically, 55% of the companies conduct annual director elections; 45% of the companies have directors elected on a staggered basis. When directors are elected on a staggered basis, they are predominately elected every three years.

Vote standards in uncontested elections: Of the companies surveyed, 76% had a “majority” vote standard for uncontested director elections. Though a majority vote standard is clearly prevalent among the companies surveyed, this majority falls below that of major public companies. According to the Council of Institutional Investors, 90% of S&P 500 companies maintain a majority vote standard for uncontested elections.

Committee chair independence: Almost all of the companies surveyed have independent committee chairs and all members of the committees are independent with few exceptions. The main exceptions occur where there is a controlled company or no requirement for a standing nominating or compensation committee (e.g., Nasdaq-listed companies). For the audit committee, there are no exceptions — all audit committee chairs and all directors on such committee are independent in the survey sample.

 


Other related articles

  • Driving a Focus on Risk
    Published February 19, 2020
    By Eve Tahmincioglu
    Risk mania has taken over the corporate governance discussion today but defining risk and figuring out how to deal with it can be dizzying for boardsDinesh Paliwal the chief executive officer of Harma ...
  • The Character of the Corporation: 10 ways to get started on your ESG journey
    Published February 19, 2020
    By Robert H. Rock
    America is experiencing record growth which has provided abundant jobs wage growth and wealth generation for a majority of Americans Yet income inequality and wealth disparity are alarmingly high brin ...
  • The Character of the Corporation: A deep dive into our forum’s biggest questions
    Published February 19, 2020
    By Eve Tahmincioglu and David Shaw
    As most board members know environmental social and governance issues ESG are all the rage with institutional investors putting pressure on public companies to think beyond maximizing value for shareh ...
  • Human Capital Governance: The beginning of a new era.
    Published February 19, 2020
    By Don Delves, Amy DeVyler Levanat and John Bremen
    The era of human capital has arrived in the boardroom and with it the need for more thorough board oversight and governance of this missioncritical investmentAs evidence consider three current paradig ...