Board Size: Governance experts see smaller boards as more effective, but who’s listening?
By Eve Tahmincioglu and April Hall

Late last year, General Electric Company’s Chairman and CEO John L. Flannery announced plans to shrink the board to 12 directors from 18 as part of an effort to bolster growth.

It was part of a board restructuring process, he added, to find “the right mix of composition of skills going forward to support the company.”

The move was seen as positive by many governance experts.

Studies on board size and financial performance, says Michael Useem, a management professor and director, Center for Leadership and Change Management at Wharton, point to a sweet spot for the most effective boards. “Boards that are too small — under seven — don’t have enough expertise and diverse strategic thinking, but over 13 they become too unwieldy to be effective,” he explains.

Special Report

Read More

Environmental, Social & Governance: Key transparency and performance issues for 2018.

Director Liability: Boards are on the hot seat over data breaches, illegal sales practices and more.

Shareholder Engagement: BlackRock, CalSTRS, among other investors, upping pressure on boards.

Truth in Financial Reporting: Is Your CEO Lying?

Blockchain: ‘Fraud’ or Fortune?

Gender Diversity: Former DuPont CEO looks to bolster gender diversity in the C-suite and boardroom.

Sexual Harassment: Boards Can’t Be Silent

Despite this, many companies are going in the opposite direction.

According to the 2017 Spencer Stuart U.S. Board Index:

…the number of larger boards appears to be ticking up; 18% have 13 or more members, compared with 16% last year and 14% five years ago. The majority of these larger boards have 13 or 14 members.

Despite the uptick, Useem says GE made a great move by deciding to shrink its board and he expects other companies with large boards to follow their lead this year.

Smaller boards, however, aren’t all positive.

One study found increasing the size of a board benefits women and minority candidates.

“Ad hoc changes in board size appear to provide boards with more flexibility to add women and (to a lesser degree) ethnic or racially diverse candidates to their boards,” according to a IRRC Institute 2017 report Board Refreshment Trends at S&P 1500 Firms. “Notably, such board expansions may allow boards to bring more diverse candidates onto their rosters without the necessity of replacing specific skill sets of sitting directors who will soon exit the boardroom.”

Here’s a list of boards with 13 or more board members from Spencer Stuart.


Issue: 
2018 First Quarter

Other related articles

  • Crisis Management
    Published October 14, 2019
    By Jose R. Rodriguez
    Making it safe for people to do the right thingCrisis prevention has taken on greater urgency for management and boards as corporate crises frequently selfinflicted continue to make headlines The deep ...
  • Human Capitalism
    Published October 14, 2019
    By David Shaw
    When the going gets tough how important will those stakeholders really beAt the heart of the discussion surrounding environmental social and governance issues ESG is the extreme tension between the sh ...
  • My Board Journey: Anthony Earley, Director, Ford Motor Company, Southern Company and CLEAResult
    Published October 14, 2019
    By Directors and Boards
    I understand your first board stint was with Long Island lighting Company How did you end up on that boardMy first board experience was somewhat atypical but did give me insights into what skills are ...
  • Pickens Carried Friedman’s Torch
    Published October 14, 2019
    By Eve Tahmincioglu
    Almost every story on the origins of corporate Americans shareholdercentric approach includes a history lesson on economist Milton Friedman and his role in bolstering the concept that many believe has ...