Board Size: Governance experts see smaller boards as more effective, but who’s listening?
By Eve Tahmincioglu and April Hall

Late last year, General Electric Company’s Chairman and CEO John L. Flannery announced plans to shrink the board to 12 directors from 18 as part of an effort to bolster growth.

It was part of a board restructuring process, he added, to find “the right mix of composition of skills going forward to support the company.”

The move was seen as positive by many governance experts.

Studies on board size and financial performance, says Michael Useem, a management professor and director, Center for Leadership and Change Management at Wharton, point to a sweet spot for the most effective boards. “Boards that are too small — under seven — don’t have enough expertise and diverse strategic thinking, but over 13 they become too unwieldy to be effective,” he explains.

Special Report

Read More

Environmental, Social & Governance: Key transparency and performance issues for 2018.

Director Liability: Boards are on the hot seat over data breaches, illegal sales practices and more.

Shareholder Engagement: BlackRock, CalSTRS, among other investors, upping pressure on boards.

Truth in Financial Reporting: Is Your CEO Lying?

Blockchain: ‘Fraud’ or Fortune?

Gender Diversity: Former DuPont CEO looks to bolster gender diversity in the C-suite and boardroom.

Sexual Harassment: Boards Can’t Be Silent

Despite this, many companies are going in the opposite direction.

According to the 2017 Spencer Stuart U.S. Board Index:

…the number of larger boards appears to be ticking up; 18% have 13 or more members, compared with 16% last year and 14% five years ago. The majority of these larger boards have 13 or 14 members.

Despite the uptick, Useem says GE made a great move by deciding to shrink its board and he expects other companies with large boards to follow their lead this year.

Smaller boards, however, aren’t all positive.

One study found increasing the size of a board benefits women and minority candidates.

“Ad hoc changes in board size appear to provide boards with more flexibility to add women and (to a lesser degree) ethnic or racially diverse candidates to their boards,” according to a IRRC Institute 2017 report Board Refreshment Trends at S&P 1500 Firms. “Notably, such board expansions may allow boards to bring more diverse candidates onto their rosters without the necessity of replacing specific skill sets of sitting directors who will soon exit the boardroom.”

Here’s a list of boards with 13 or more board members from Spencer Stuart.


Issue: 
2018 First Quarter

Other related articles

  • Attracting Talent Beyond Just a Paycheck
    Published August 14, 2018
    By J. Veronica Biggins
    How purpose, meaning and fun drives visionary leadership.The post-Boomer generation now assuming leadership roles — and certainly those from the Millennial generation who will follow — bring with ...
  • TOP OF MIND: What directors are thinking
    Published August 09, 2018
    By Eve Tahmincioglu
    KAPILA ANAND, DIRECTOR: WomenCorporateDirectors, Extended Stay America, ESH Hospitality and Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.Board diversity has been on the minds of many nominating and governance (N&a ...
  • My Board Journey: PAMELA THOMAS-GRAHAM
    Published August 08, 2018
    By Eve Tahmincioglu
    Pamela Thomas-Graham, chief executive officer of Dandelion Chandelier LLC, a private digital media enterprise reporting on luxury goods and services, is a director at Peloton, The Clorox Company, and ...
  • Boards Can’t Ignore the Lure of a Flexible Workplace
    Published August 08, 2018
    By Cali Yost
    To tackle complex talent-related challenges, today and in the future, organizations will have to build high-performance flexible work cultures.That means boards have to educate themselves about why a ...