Beware 'credenzaware'

Spencer Stuart / DirectorS & Boar DS Director S r oSter 16 directors & boards C redenzaware is the term we somewhat humorously use to d e s c r i b e t h e u n re a l i ze d output of well-intended or- ganizational studies and project initia- tives that all too often find their way to the shelves, disk drives, and credenzas of senior executives. (This term origi- nally came to our attention when it was used by Larry Bossidy and Ram Charan in their book Execution, in which they discuss the need for candid, robust dia- logue in the planning processes.) Credenzaware often has auspicious beginnings; emerging from competitive pressure and best in class intentions, hammered out from long and diligent hours of staff effort, offering provocative recommendations whose subsequent implementation is derailed, discounted, and dumped by the absence of account- ability and unclear cause-effect linkage with business outcomes. Credenzaware is nice work that goes nowhere. Where does credenzaware breed? • Problem Statement Drift: Creden- zaware breeds when a problem is not framed tightly and clearly ; when the initial problem statement begins to bob and weave. Project work may be com- missioned but progress too often feels more like solutions in search of prob- lems. The resulting outcome often fails to address a matter that the collective leadership team deemed vital in the first place. Results may indeed be interest- ing but will fail to stimulate a collective commitment to action. • Conspiracy of Politeness: This can- cerous form of politeness exists where senior meetings occur without tough questions asked; challenges are rare; discussions feel choreographed; and the “Q&A” phase appears managed. Trust, candor and full disclosure are not oper- ating. Discussions just never penetrate the façade. There may be an unwritten rule that has emerged of “let’s all be po- lite and civil here.” • Loose Accountability: While project design and implementation responsibil- ities are often delegated to staff groups, accountability for outcomes and strate- gic change management rests with se- nior leadership. When decision-making meetings conclude without assignment of senior management accountability for action and outcomes, the initiative is on the road to credenzaware-land. Ac- 16 directors & boards c ompetitive eDge Beware ‘credenzaware’ Too many misguided, ignored, and abandoned initiatives diminish a leader’s credibility. By patrick r. Dailey anD charleS h. BiShop Jr. Spencer Stuart / DirectorS & Boar DS Director S r oSter fourth quarter 2008 17 countable leader(s) should not necessar- ily feel threatened, yet should feel on the “hot seat” for managed action. • Shaky Project Leadership: Properly commissioned projects and initiatives can inadvertently find themselves on the road to credenzaware-land when the se- lection of project leadership is driven by “who is available” vs. “who is essential.” The wrong leadership selection immedi- ately sends damaging signals about pri- ority, collaboration, and resources across the organization. Bungled project lead- ership appointments — inept technical skills, project management and/or facili- tation skills — derails and overburdens a well-targeted project due to rework, de- terioration of cross-functional collabo- ration, and clumsy communication. • Absence of the “Wow Factor”: Senior leaders repeatedly get caught up in the dilemma of every initiative being deemed an “A” priority. Project leaders lobby and compete for the active personal and political support by boards and senior leadership in their project. There are just so many projects and initiatives that the senior team can sponsor and monitor. There is an implicit line below which there is no real time, no excitement, no personal payoff — the juice is just not worth the squeeze. These “no wow” ini- tiatives often fail to get fully airborne as they meander along, searching for senior sponsorship, and consuming political capital and material resources. As these failed initiatives ultimately subside and die, their residue surely does land on the senior leader’s credenza. Credenzaware saps vitality and di- minishes confidence. Ever y organiza- tion strives to create, evolve, and hold on to its distinctive performance culture — its secret sauce. However, the buildup of credenzaware on an executive’s shelf is a clear indicator that the organization is losing its edge — its competitive agil- ity. Too many misguided and abandoned projects bankrupt a leader’s credibility in setting the organization’s course and skillfully navigating it through change to a more competitive position. Where credenzaware builds up, your board will find an organization that is confused, abused, and “bummed out.” ■ The authors can be contacted at pdailey1@ yahoo.com and charlie@chicagochange.com. c ompetitive eDge Patrick R. Dailey, Ph.D. (left), and Charles H. Bishop Jr., Ph.D., founded Chicago Change Partners, a human resources consulting firm specializing in supporting senior leaders and their teams navigate personal and organiza- tional change (www.chicagochange.com). Sidley Austin LLP is one of the world’s largest full-service law firms, with more than 1800 lawyers practicing in 16 U.S. and international cities. Every year since 2003, Sidley has been named to Legal Business’ Global Elite, their designation for “the 15 finest law firms in the world.” BTI, a Boston-based consulting and research firm, has named Sidley to their Client Service Hall of Fame as one of only two law firms to rank in the Client Service Top 10 for seven years in a row. The firm offers its clients extensive experience in transactional, regulatory and litigation matters spanning virtually every area of substantive law. We advise corporate management, boards of directors and committees on a wide variety of corporate governance matters. Clients call on us for advice on best practices for boards and their standing committees in governance and related disclosure processes. We provide a multi-disciplinary response for companies contending with activist shareholders and for boards that need independent counsel for internal investigations and for special litigation and transaction committees. BEIJINGBRUSSELSCHICAGODALLASFRANKFURTGENEVAHONG KONGLONDONLOS ANGELES NEW YORKSAN FRANCISCOSHANGHAISINGAPORESYDNEYTOKYOWASHINGTON, D.C. Sidley Austin LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership which operates at the firm’s offices other than Chicago, London, Hong Kong, and Sydney, is affiliated with other partnerships, including Sidley Austin LLP, an Illinois limited liability partnership (Chicago); Sidley Austin LLP, a separate Delaware limited liability partnership (London); Sidley Austin, a New York general partnership (Hong Kong); Sidley Austin, a Delaware general partnership of registered foreign lawyers restricted to practicing foreign law (Sydney); and Sidley Austin Nishikawa Foreign Law Joint Enterprise (Tokyo). The affiliated partnerships are referred to herein collectively as Sidley Austin, Sidley, or the firm.Attorney Advertising. For purposes of compliance with New York State Bar rules, Sidley Austin LLP’s headquarters are 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019, 212.839.5300 and One South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60603, 312.853.7000. Prior results described herein do not guarantee a similar outcome. Joseph W. Armbrust, Jr.787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019T: 212.839.5300 | F: 212.839.5599 www.sidley.com Thomas A. ColeOne South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60603T: 312.853.7000 | F: 312.853.7036
 

Other related articles