Ask the Dumb Questions: Where journalism and corporate governance meet.
By April Hall

Very early in my career, an editor said, “If April doesn’t know the answer, she knows where to get it.”

Considering that was more than 20 years ago, it’s obviously a point of pride for me. I don’t think I have to be an expert in all things in order to do my job well. I need to find the experts, ask the right questions and then let them speak. I need to be able to translate “expertise” into prose that nearly anyone could read and understand.

Directors need to have the same kind of curiosity and often find themselves in trouble when they don’t. That’s been illustrated by recent Delaware Supreme Court rulings. Under Caremark and Marchand, plaintiffs were able to bring cases against boards for not knowing about risks associated with their businesses, rather than making poor decisions around known risk.

For directors to protect themselves, attorneys from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP suggest in a recent piece for the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, “…when follow up steps are requested by the board, management should promptly provide any additional information to the board, and the board should expect, and indeed ensure, that they receive answers or information that satisfies their requests at subsequent board meetings.”

This is not always the way it happens. And sometimes it’s not solely management’s fault. Dennis Cagan, an experienced director of both private and public companies, recently wrote a piece for the Directors & Boards website, “The Mushroom Board: Don’t Be Kept in the Dark.”

In his experience, he says one of the downfalls of the mushroom board is that directors “generally ask very few questions and even those are not difficult, probing ones. On these boards, dissent is clearly frowned upon. All votes are in unanimous perfunctory agreement with the CEO.”

We also learn about breakdowns in communication that can keep a scandal-level problem off of the board’s agenda in Frederick D. Lipman’s book, Enhanced Corporate Governance: Avoiding Unpleasant Surprises, which is reviewed in this issue.

For example, if the board is hearing only from the CEO, directors are hearing only one perspective on the company’s operations. It could be that the CEO is misinterpreting information received from subordinates or, at worst, may be averse to reporting bad news. That single report at meetings could also represent a problematic relationship in the C-suite. Do other managers feel empowered to speak to the board?

I don’t write stories with one source — even experts disagree on issues from time to time. And you aren’t the expert on the company because you aren’t running day-to-day operations. Serving on a board is a feature story, not an op-ed, so be sure you know all sides of the story.

To be sure that you are not only making the right decisions, but also keeping your finger on the pulse of the enterprise, you should assess your board meetings: Are they becoming formulaic? Is there discussion, or just a manager reading verbatim the report that sits in front of you? When was the last time you heard “bad” news?

If you are concerned you aren’t getting the whole story at board meetings, it’s time to start asking questions — even if you think they could be “dumb.”

Yes, yes, I know.  We all say, “there are no stupid questions,” but many people still feel self-conscious about asking basic questions, especially if they get the sense, even from their fellow directors, that asking questions gums up the works and stretches out a meeting that has already been on for hours.

The specter of a Caremark claim should push those concerns out of your mind. At some point down the road, you don’t want to see a lawsuit with your name on it and know it’s a result of not trusting your gut feeling that something was off. It could cost you your reputation and destroy the business.

E. Norman Veasey, former chief justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, once said, “Directors who are supposed to be independent should have the guts to be a pain in the neck and act independently.”

And that’s a place where governance and journalism meet in purpose. If you don’t answer every question and instead assume that everything in the business is just fine, you can get it wrong. And printing a retraction is not an option for a board member.

April Hall is managing editor of Directors & Boards. She welcomes feedback at april.hall@directorsandboards.com.


Other related articles

  • The Path to Defining Diversity
    Published April 28, 2021
    By Steven A. Seiden
    The movement against racial inequality coupled with ESG principles has intensified pressure on boards to refresh with diversity candidates Political agitation is also intensifying as states like Calif ...
  • Board of the Past Won’t Take Your Company into the Future
    Published April 15, 2021
    By N.K. “Trip” Tripathy and Glenn C. Davis
    Were in a new world one that requires a new paradigm of management leadership and board oversightnbspnbspnbspWith tension finally starting to ease on the heels of 2020s prospect for unparalleled econ ...
  • Red Corporation, Blue Corporation? Corporate political speech becomes a board issue
    Published April 13, 2021
    By April Hall
    After the January 6 attack on the US Capitol many companies announced that they would halt political contributions either permanently or for a defined period Some discontinuations involved a particula ...
  • US Politics and Corporate Speech: A Two-Edged Sword
    Published April 13, 2021
    By Richard Sylla
    In its 2010 Citizens United decision the Supreme Court gave corporations relatively unlimited freespeech rights to spend corporate funds for political causes and candidates A part of the majoritys rea ...