![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Volume 3, Number 9 • September 2006
|
|||
|
||||
|
Are you reading a pass along copy? Get your own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE and send a blank email. You will be automatically unsubscribed.
![]() ![]()
James Kristie Lisa
Cody David Shaw Scott Chase Nancy Maynard Barbara Wenger Jerri Smith 1845 Walnut Street
|
Your
response:
‘Surprise’
GovernanceWhen you never know how your company is going to be surprised from day to day, the great need is to meet each surprise with more knowledge and creativity. By Sir Robert Horton Directors from Academia Can Fill Gaps in
TalentThere are three types of candidates, and each can make a distinctive contribution to a board’s deliberations. Increasingly, U.S. public companies are turning to academics as nonexecutive directors. An industry survey reports that 10 percent of new independent directors appointed in 2005 came from academic or nonprofit backgrounds, compared with 2 percent in 2000. This shift is attributable in part to availability. In a tougher corporate governance environment, with greater time commitments required of independent directors, it is not feasible for senior line managers--CEOs and CFOs--to serve on more than one public company board other than their own. The experience gained must also be offset against the financial and reputation risk, both personal and corporate, in a post-Enron world. Additional criteria for qualifying as an independent director, including restrictions on interlocking directorships, further limit the availability of CEOs and others in the business community for board appointments. Academics can help to address the resulting gap in the talent pool. There are three types of academics serving on company boards: the specialist, the ex-practitioner, and the administrator. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Theo Sharp Managing Director Pearl Meyer & Partners
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a
Directors & Boards reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase. What kind of time pressures do companies face in complying with the SEC’s new rules for proxy disclosure? Things will be toughest for calendar-year companies, which must report under the new rules in their Spring proxies, leaving just a few months to implement major upgrades to internal data collection processes. Non-calendar year organizations generally have a cushion of several additional months to bring their systems into line with the new rules before having to report under the new rules later in 2007. That also gives them the added advantage of learning from the experience of companies making the initial disclosures. Along with examples of the new tabular and narrative disclosures required, the later filers will get a preview of how the SEC, investors and the media react to specific aspects of the expanded reporting – in other words, the proverbial “Holy Cow” disclosures most likely to raise public hackles. Another big challenge is the fact that disclosure isn’t about just numbers anymore. The SEC’s new rules include a large qualitative element. At numerous places throughout the compensation disclosure, most notably the central Compensation Disclosure and Analysis (CD&A), companies must provide a narrative explanation for shareholders – without boilerplate and in “plain English” – of the strategy and rationale behind the pay plans in place. Further, the reasons for utilizing one particular element as opposed to another (e.g.,, cash vs. equity) must be outlined. This will be a major challenge at many companies where there has not been a specific pay strategy in the past or where decision-making processes have not been well documented. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Growth in board of director compensation appears to have slowed, according to a new study from Mercer Human Resource Consulting. The study, based on an analysis of proxy statements of 350 mainly large publicly traded U.S. organizations, found that director pay increased modestly in 2005 compared to rece nt years. The study also found that the use of stock options to compensate directors continued to decline in favor of other equity vehicles. Median total direct compensation (pay for board and committee service, and equity grants) for board members at large U.S. companies increased 6.1% in 2005 to $164,637. That increase contrasts sharply with the much higher 17.8% jump in overall director pay between 2003 and 2004. For more Mercer study findings, along with a table of median total direct compensation by revenue, click here. Another study by Steven Hall & Partners, independent executive compensation consultants (http://www.shallpartners.com), shows median total remuneration for directors of the 200 largest U.S companies in 2005/2006 ranged from $195,000 to $210,833, an increase of between 8.1 percent and 12.4 percent, depending on committee memberships and roles. The research also showed that full-value stock awards to directors are eclipsing stock option grants with the median value of full-value stock awards up 25 percent. The firm also has a study of 2005/2006 director compensation trends for 1,000 large companies underway. Contact Nora McCord at Steven Hall & Partners (212-488-5400, nmccord@shallpartners.com) to request a copy of the full study on its completion.
September
14, 2006 September
25-26, 2006 October
12, 2006 October
15-17, 2006 October
25, 2006 October
25-27, 2006 October
29 - November 2, 2006 November
1-3, 2006 November
2-3, 2006 November
9-10, 2006 November
15-17, 2006 November
30-December 1, 2006 BoardSource, the premier resource for information on nonprofit governance, will hold its "2006 BoardSource Leadership Forum: Set Your Sights on Exceptional Governance" in Chicago. More than 600 nonprofit governance leaders will come together to discuss key governance issues relating to public charities, associations, foundations, and other nonprofit organizations. Featured speakers will include Roxanne Spillett, president, Boys & Girls Clubs of America; Richard P. Chait, professor, Harvard Graduate School of Education; James E. Canales, president and CEO, The James Irvine Foundation; David Nygren, partner, Mercer Delta Consulting; and Michael Chu, senior partner, Pegasus Capital. Forum sessions will address fundraising, board leadership, executive transitions, board capacity building, effective decision making, troublesome board members, and other topics. To register visit Boardroom Briefing: Mergers &
AcquisitionsDirectors & Boards' Boardroom Briefing: Mergers & Acquisitions is now in the mail. This edition focuses on such key issues as the board's role in M&A, fairness opinions and valuation opinions, post M&A compensation and more. The results of Directors & Boards' most recent survey on M&A is also included. To view the Boadroom Briefing online, visit here. Hedge Funds: A Battle-Ready Profile Activist hedge funds have had “surprising success” with their proposals against targeted companies, with more than 35% of campaigns resulting in their winning board representatives, according to a study by investment bank Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.’s newly formed Shareholder Activist Group (http://www.morganjoseph.com). The group authored a report, “Management in an Era of Shareholder Activism,” that warns that the emergence of a new class of activist investors will force management to be more mindful of their potential vulnerability. In the study, Morgan Joseph examined 94 campaigns waged publicly by 29 hedge funds. As a group, the 29 activist hedge funds ranged in size from less than $100 million to nearly $10 billion under management, with average equity capital of $1.9 billion. The report concluded that activist demands tend to be concentrated around the following initiatives: • Changing the capital structure • Altering a company’s M&A decisions, forcing a sale of all or part of the company • Replacing management or modifying a board’s composition, often to include the fund’s nominees • Returning cash to shareholders through either a dividend or a stock repurchase program The report urges all companies to undergo a vigilant review of strategic, financial, and operational initiatives to improve shareholder value. The firm held a conference call in August with corporate managements to discuss the results of the study. For more information on the report, e-mail Steven Anreder at steven.anreder@anreder.com. Certification For Compliance and Ethics Professionals Beginning in September 2006, compliance and ethics professionals have an opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge and expertise in the practice of corporate compliance. The Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics (SCCE) has established a program that will provide a Certified Compliance & Ethics Professional certification to individuals associated with the compliance and ethics profession. For details visit the SCCE Web Site: http://www.corporatecompliance.org/CCEP/ccep.htm Headquartered in Minneapolis, the SCCE is a nonprofit organization dedicated to enhancing the role of compliance professional, and advancing corporate governance, compliance and ethics on a global scale. Its mission is to champion compliance standards, corporate governance, and ethical practice in the business community, and to provide the necessary resources for compliance and ethics professionals and others who share these principles. People And Processes Not In Sync: Deloitte Survey Nearly half of senior executives worldwide surveyed by Deloitte and the Economist Intelligence Unit report that their people and processes are not in sync with overall corporate strategy. As a result, companies may be missing opportunities to increase and protect their value and may fall short of reaching their true potential. According to the survey report, “Adopting the Value Habit (And Unleashing More Value for Your Stakeholders),” respondents identified three primary obstacles to the value-creation process within their companies: misalignment of processes, people, and systems with strategy; an inconsistent link between value-creation and the approval, execution, and tracking of projects and initiatives; and low emphasis on long-term and non-financial objectives. A copy of the full survey report is available on Deloitte’s Web site at http://www.deloitte.com/us/adoptingvaluehabit. Author Notes Felix Rohatyn is joining Lehman Brothers Holdings as a senior adviser. Rohatyn was the subject of a Spring 2003 Directors & Boards cover story interview with D&B columnist Hoffer Kaback. Among the memorable moments in their discussion, the longtime Lazard investment banker recalled being on the board of Avis Rent-A-Car in the 1960s when Lazard bought control of Avis, and having Avis’s iconoclastic CEO Robert Townsend tell him, “A really good board is one that only reduces the efficiency of the company by 20%.” Townsend later went on the write the brilliant bestseller, Up the Organization. Anne Klein, president of Anne Klein & Associates, a public relations consulting firm in the Philadelphia region (http://www.akleinpr.com), has been inducted into Rowan University’s Public Relations Hall of Fame. The award recognizes PR professionals of national prominence. Klein authored a major crisis management advisory that was published in the September 2004 e-Briefing. AlixPartners LLC (http://www.alixpartners.com), a corporate turnaround and financial advisory services firm whose principals have authored several articles for Directors & Boards, arranged a significant investment in the firm by Hellman & Friedman LLC, a private equity investor. The recapitalization, which puts the total enterprise value of the firm in excess of $800 million, will allow the AlixPartners 78 managing directors along with its more than 500 employees to gain a sizeable equity stake in the enterprise. Back to the Top Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2006, MLR Holdings LLC. |
|||