|
|
From Jim Kristie | Article of the
Month | Columnist
Reader Profile |
Research | News |


Hijinks at Hewlett-Packard
What is the most surprising thing to you about what went on in the H-P
boardroom?
I have a few questions about the Hewlett-Packard situation. I’m sure
you do too. It’s a fast-moving story, with new revelations almost every
day. By the time this e-Briefing comes out, some of these questions may
be answered. But here goes:
• You mean to tell me that all the H-P directors actually sat around
the board table one day and approved a motion to allow investigators to
probe their off-site, personal dealings and communications?
• Or, was there a gentleman’s “understanding” that only certain of
their members would be investigated?
• How did the involved directors and members of management who
initiated the leak investigation expect to find the leaker without some
access to and examination of phone records?
• That being understood, here is a real puzzler: If he was in the know
on approving the investigation, why didn’t a director like Lawrence
Babbio Jr., vice chairman and president of Verizon Communications,
sound the alarm to the rest of his cohorts that any incursion into
phone record examination would be at best problematic if not outright
illegal? He should resign from the board in shame. If he wasn’t in the
know on the investigation, why isn’t he resigning from the board in
outrage over what has happened and to make a statement about Verizon
being a trustworthy brand in an age of identity theft? (As a Verizon
customer, I am doubly disturbed about this mishandling of phone records
right under the nose of a senior officer of the company.)
Not to pick just on Mr. Babbio--there is plenty of shame and outrage to
go around both on and off that board.
I’m sure all of you have your own unanswered questions or musings about
this board matter gone awry. Share those with us in this month’s
Question of the Month: “What is the most surprising thing to you in all
that you’ve read and heard about the Hewlett-Packard director
investigation scheme?”
There are no yes or no answers or suggested responses. We’re changing
the format and making this an open-ended comment opportunity. This is
such a riveting tale and one that everybody has an opinion on, and we
welcome you to tell us yours. We’ll carve out a chunk of next month’s
e-Briefing to share those responses. Click here to
tell us what you think.
Our question of the month for September was “What will be the price of
a barrel of oil on December 31, 2006?” No sooner did we ask this than
the price of oil did a sharp reversal--from $77 a barrel to, as I
write, $62. (Hmmm … maybe we should keep asking this question.) Here
are your guesstimates:
• Over $80 a barrel: 9%
• Between $70 and $80: 11%
• Between $60 and $70: 31%
• Between $50 and $60: 49%
• Below $50: 0%
I see that no one is anticipating sub-$50 prices. Maybe that is the way
to bet. Wouldn’t that be a kicker?
Speaking of kickers, the special 30th
anniversary edition of Directors & Boards will be a slam-bang
issue. It comes off press this month. Reserve
your copy today. You won’t want to miss it.
Jim
Kristie is the editor and
associate publisher of Directors
& Boards.
Back
to the Top



Option
Pricing Issues: Six Questions You Should Be Asking
Looking for problems is almost a guarantee
that you will find some. However, the consequences are likely to be
less onerous if the company is proactive rather than reactive.
By Paul R. Berger, Lawrence K. Cagney, W.
Neil Eggleston, David P. Mason, Elizabeth Pagel Serebransky and Colby
A. Smith
The spate of companies identified in the popular press as having
problems with regard to the timing and pricing of option grants
continues to grow. A recent study suggests that, at least with respect
to the period from 1999 to 2000, this issue is prevalent at a large
percentage of growth companies where options represent a significant
portion of total compensation. The problems run the gamut from
apparently deliberate backdating for the enrichment of corporate
insiders to inadvertent errors arising from less than disciplined
governance practices.
The consequences of these problems can be far-reaching, ranging from:
• failing to reflect appropriate financial accounting
charges associated with essentially discounted stock options;
• deficiencies in the company’s disclosure in its
proxy statements and periodic reports;
• adverse tax consequences for the company to the
extent the option is exercised by an officer who is a covered employee
under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”);
• adverse tax consequences for the optionee by reason
of Section 409A of the Code, if the option had not vested by December
31, 2004;
• questions regarding the authority to grant the
options to the extent the plan under which the options were granted did
not permit the grant of “discounted options,” particularly if the
company’s state of incorporation requires shareholder approval for the
issuance of stock options and similar rights;
• possible investigations by the U.S. Attorney
(particularly in New York and San Francisco) or the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and
• shareholder derivative litigation alleging, among
other things, breach of fiduciary duty.
[Click
Here to Read
the Entire Article]
Back
to the Top

 

Contemplating an Internal Investigation? Here Are Some Dos and Don’ts
Permissible tactics, PR
concerns, safeguards, and other considerations for boards in
authorizing an investigation.
By Ellen Zimiles and Scott Moritz
The scandal embroiling the Hewlett-Packard board of directors has
brought the subject of corporate internal investigations to the fore in
the media and in corporate governance circles. Indeed these recent
events are enough to have made some management and directors somewhat
reticent about using outside investigators.
Yet one thing remains undeniably clear: Companies will continue to be
obligated to conduct internal investigations when they are in receipt
of allegations of fraud or misconduct. At the same time, board members
have become increasingly aware that they must uphold the highest level
of integrity and ethical standards as they exercise their
responsibilities to the company and their shareholders.
What the H-P case has brought into focus for many is the importance of
achieving a better understanding of the methods typically utilized by
investigators working on behalf of the board. Such awareness training
should include both the legal boundaries that should be observed and
the potential for public relations debacles should details of actions
taken reach the press.
A good first step for boards to take as they make decisions about
authorizing internal investigations is for the directors to review the
company’s code of conduct. It is important to remember that the code of
conduct isn’t simply an employee handbook; rather it constitutes the
rules of behavior that govern the entire organization from the top
down.
[Click
Here to Read
the Entire Article]
Back
to the Top

 
Trent Gazzaway
Managing Partner--Corporate Governance
Grant Thornton
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a
Directors & Boards reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase.
What different challenges do
audit committees face in small/medium companies vs. larger
organizations?
Larger companies typically have access to a wider array of resources to
handle complex areas of accounting and financial reporting than do
smaller companies. Consequently, audit committees of smaller
companies have to be a little bit more diligent in making sure that
their companies have a good handle on the related issues. They should
be on the lookout for areas where management may need to hire or engage
additional resources. In addition, smaller companies often rely
heavily on direct oversight by senior management to mitigate financial
reporting risks. As these companies grow there is often a point
at which the management team needs to delegate responsibility and
implement some additional controls. This point is often hard to see
until after it has gone by. Audit committees of smaller companies
should continually monitor the financial reporting risks that
management feels like they control by “being on the ground,” and
evaluate the potential need for additional resources commensurate with
the level of growth.
How has the role of the board
and audit committee changed since Sarbanes-Oxley?
Boards and audit committees are now setting a more healthy distance
between themselves and management. It has been said that the days of
board meetings being about shaking hands, smoking cigars and playing
golf are over. While that is clearly an overgeneralization of the past,
we are clearly seeing boards and audit committees exercise what we call
a “healthy skepticism” regarding management’s activities. I stress the
word “healthy” because the last thing you want is a board that
approaches its duties from an adversarial position without just cause
to do so. A good board and a good audit committee will give the average
management team the benefit of the doubt, while at the same time being
willing to ask some tough questions when necessary.
[Click Here to Read
the Entire Article]
Back
to the Top


U.S. companies have $450 billion sitting on
the sidelines
The money is trapped in working
capital, an amount equal to the gross national product of Switzerland
Companies are still leaving millions in untapped cash tied up in
working capital, but the best companies – those with world class
processes – are better at wringing it out of their business than their
peers.
This according to a September 2006 a survey conducted by Hackett – REL,
the Total Working Capital practice of The Hackett Group. The
survey focused on Total Working Capital trends, in both America and
Europe.
Total Working Capital (TWC) can be found money for businesses.
Better, smarter management of the components of Working Capital:
current assets like accounts receivable; inventory; accounts payable
and cash, can help a business thrive, rather than merely survive.
Key findings of the survey include:
- The top 1,000 U.S. companies
liberated $72 billion of cash from working capital in 2005 by enhancing
the way they collect bills from customers, pay suppliers, and manage
inventory.
- U.S. companies still have
$450 billion unnecessarily locked up in working capital, based on the
gap between typical companies and top-quartile total working capital
performers in the Hackett-REL analysis.
- In the retail world, one top
performer was able to access 9% more working capital in 2005 than 2004,
while the average American retailers in general made a 3% gain.
- Industry sectors that lagged
behind included cosmetics, newspaper publishers and software;
supporting the notion that those industries will be under increasing
pressure to perform.
- Improvement among U.S.
companies accelerated dramatically year-over-year, with companies
generating 55% greater levels of working capital reduction than in
2004.
Back
to the Top
October
10-13, 2006
The National Association of Stock Plan Professionals holds its 14th
Annual Conference in Las Vegas, with the theme, "Practical Guidance in
a Time of Change." More than 100 of the top names in the compensation
field will focus on the latest practices, strategies, and solutions for
responding to new accounting requirements and fundamental changes in
tax law as well as increased scrutiny of plan practices. To register,
visit http://www.naspp.com or call
the NASPP at 1-925-685-9271.
October
11, 2006
Heidrick & Struggles and Steven Hall & Partners host "Board
Exchange," a networking and information-sharing forum for publi-company
board directors to discuss top-of-the-mind board-related issues,
including director selection, pay, performance, disclosure, risk and
liability. Held in New York, it will be a morning panel discussion
followed by a luncheon and keynote address. For more information, call
Margaret McConville at 212-551-0510, or e-mail mmconville@heidrick.com.
October
12, 2006
CompensationStandards.com will hold its 3rd Annual Executive
Compensation Conference in Las Vegas, which will also be available by
audio and video webcast. The theme of the one-day conference is
"Meeting New Standards: What Every Director (and Advisor) Needs to Know
-- and Do -- Now!" and is designed for all parties involved in and
responsible for implementing executive and equity compensation plans.
For further information, visit 3rd Annual Executive Compensation
Conference at http://www.compensationstandards.com/Conference06/register/start.asp

October
12, 2006
The National Association of Corporate Directors New York Chapter is
having a luncheon program on "Role of the Lead Director." Topics
tackled will be: What value is it creating? What are some of the
pitfalls? How is it interfacing with the chairman and CEO? On the panel
will be Arthur Martinez, retired chairman and CEO of Sears Roebuck;
John Krol, retired chairman and CEO of Du Pont; and Robert Holland,
former president and CEO of Ben & Jerry's Homemade Inc., and the
discussion will be moderated by Roger Kenny, managing partner,
Boardroom Consultants. To register, call 1-866-648-3369, or e-mail
oleary@nacdny.org.
October
15-17, 2006
The National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) holds its 2006
Annual Corporate Governance Conference. Themed "The Board Agenda:
Driving Long-Term Value," the program will cover the evolving best
practices in board oversight of executive compensation, strategy
development, succession planning, board evaluation, and the results of
the NACD's 2006 Blue Ribbon Commission on "Board Practices in
High-Performing Companies." The conference will be held at the
Renaissance Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. For registration and
hotel information (last year's conference sold out) call 202-775-0509,
or visit http://www.nacdonline.org
October
23-24, 2006
The Sanders Morris Harris investment banking firm is holding its
"Middle Market Investor Growth Conference." It is its second annual
invitation-only conference designed for discerning public companies and
qualified investors. Directors & Boards is a promotional partner
for this event. For information, contact Amy Gottenberg at 212-508-4003
or e-mail amy.gottenberg@smhgroup.com.

October
25, 2006
Directorship is presenting "Agenda 07," a one-day forum that previews
major board governance issues in store for next year. Among the
speakers will be Harvey Pitt, Jim Cramer, Ken Langone, Richard Breeden,
Christie Hefner, John Connolly, and Pearl Meyer. The program will be
held at the Union League Club of New York. For registration, call
617-399-3042, or visit http://www.directorship.com
October
25-27, 2006
The New America Alliance presents the "6th Annual Wall Street Summit."
Among its objectives, the event focuses on increasing access to markets
and capital for Latino businesses, promoting the participation and
influence of Latinos on our nation's corporate and pension fund boards,
and investing in the higher education of American Latinos in the fields
of business and finance. National leaders and top executives from the
finance industry who will be participating include SEC Commissioner
Roel Campos; New York Governor George Pataki; New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer; CalPERS CEO Fred Buenrostro; and Jack Kemp, co-director
of Empower America. the summit will be held at the Waldorf-Astoria
Hotel in New York. For more information, visit http://www.naaonline.org
October
29 - November 2, 2006
The Thunderbird Global Family Enterprise Program will present "Are You
Prepared to Operate Your Family Enterprise on a Global Scale?" The
program is designed to prepare family enterprises to effectively manage
growth, establish successful governance strategies, and ensure
continuity across generations of family leaders. It will be held at the
Royal Palms Resort in Phoenix. Visit http://www.thunderbird.edu/familybusiness
for more information.
November
1-3, 2006
The Center for Corporate Excellence will hold its "Changing the Game"
Forum in Denver. The event is designed to be a thought-provoking
conference covering current issues in corporate accountability and
executive responsibility. Vanguard Group Founder Jack Bogle will be
presented with the Center's Exemplary Leadership Award, which
recognizes those who have demonstrated excellence in corporate
governance and ethical leadership. For more information, visit http://www.centerforcorporateexcellence.com
November
2-3, 2006
The University of Wisconsin-Madison presents its Directors' Summit.
This ISS- and NACD-accredited event freatures keynote speakers John
Morgridge, Chairman of Cisco Systems and Tom Stemberg, founder of
Staples, as well as panel discussions on a variety of topics. For more
information and to register, visit http://www.directorssummit.com
or call Celeste Taber at 608-441-7311 or 800-292-8964.
November
9-10, 2006
Bank Director magazine and NASDAQ present the second annual Bank
Executive and Board Compensation conference at the Four Seasons Resort
& Club, Dallas at Los Colinas. This event will focus on CEO and
director compensation challenges and solutions specifically related to
financial institutions, and brings together leading experts and
advisers, as well as experienced bankers, such as Harris H. Simmons,
chairman and CEO of Zions Bancorporation, to provide best practices.
Attendees receive a free, personalized board compensation review from
Clark Consulting (http://www.clarkconsulting.com) and option for a free
private consultation at the conference. For more information, call
800-452-9875 or visit http://www.bankdirector.com/conferences

November
15-17, 2006
The 2006 University of Delaware Directors' College will convene at the
university's John M. Clayton Hall Conference Center in Newark, Del.
Topics to be tackled include: How can directors effectively oversee
executive compensation? How do your board activities compare to others?
Where will the regulators focus next? And, what can directors do to
protect themselves legally? The program is hosted by
PricewaterhouseCoopers and the University's Lerner College of Business
and Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. To
learn more about the program, visit here.
November
30-December 1, 2006
ODX, the Outstanding Directors Exchange, will hold its next gathering
at the Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park. The conference is for
directors to exchange real-life experiences and solutions to the issues
they face in the boardroom. Speakers at this session include George
David, chairman and CEO of United Technologies; Martin Lipton, founding
partner of Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz; and Steve Miller, CEO of
Delphi Corp. To register, call 212-542-1224, or visit http://www.theODX.com
December
3-4, 2006
BoardSource, the premier resource for information
on nonprofit governance, will hold its "2006 BoardSource Leadership
Forum: Set Your Sights on Exceptional Governance" in Chicago. More than
600 nonprofit governance leaders will come together to discuss key
governance issues relating to public charities, associations,
foundations, and other nonprofit organizations. Featured speakers will
include Roxanne Spillett, president, Boys & Girls Clubs of America;
Richard P. Chait, professor, Harvard Graduate School of Education;
James E. Canales, president and CEO, The James Irvine Foundation; David
Nygren, partner, Mercer Delta Consulting; and Michael Chu, senior
partner, Pegasus Capital. Forum sessions will address fundraising,
board leadership, executive transitions, board capacity building,
effective decision making, troublesome board members, and other topics.
To register visit
http://www.boardsource.org/BLF2
or call 800-883-6262.
Back
to the Top


Boardroom Briefing: Mergers &
Acquisitions
Directors
& Boards' Boardroom Briefing: Mergers &
Acquisitions is now available. This edition focuses on such key
issues as the board's role in M&A, fairness opinions and valuation
opinions, post M&A compensation and more. The results of Directors & Boards' most recent
survey on M&A is also included. To view
the Boadroom Briefing online, visit here.
Survey Shows Slow Going for
Women Directors
The Forum of Executive Women, an organization of influential women
leaders in the Philadelphia region, released in September the research
results from its sixth annual Women on Boards survey, a look at how the
boards at the 100 largest publicly held companies in the region reflect
gender diversity. Despite some minor progress, the landscape has
changed little since last year, and Philadelphia-area companies have
made virtually no progress over the past few years.
The executive summary of the research, which will be available online
this month at http://www.foew.com,
shows that despite the large pool of qualified female executives, most
public companies stalled in their efforts to place women on local
corporate boards in 2005. “The numbers have not moved significantly”
from the prior year’s survey, said Kyra G. McGrath, president of the
organization and vice president for strategic projects and general
counsel for WHYY Inc. “They have stayed flat or, in a few cases, gone
in the wrong direction. On the positive side, we are encouraged that
the 2005 data show that two more nominating committee member chairs are
women, and that the nearly 16 percent of available open board seats
were filled with women last year — a big increase.”
CalPERS Increases Corporate
Governance Investments
The California Public Employees’ Retirement System has authorized its
staff to invest up to $600 million alongside successful partners in the
CalPERS Corporate Governance Program. CalPERS took the action following
reports that its 10 external corporate governance funds had achieved
annualized returns of 17.7 percent from their inception in January 1999
through March 31, 2006 — almost three times more than the industry
benchmark.
"The figures tell the story, and it’s all good news," said Rob Feckner,
CalPERS board president. "By improving poor financial performers, our
corporate governance investments show that we can do very well by doing
good in the marketplace." CalPERS (http://www.calpers.ca.gov)
is the nation’s largest public pension fund with assets totaling more
than $210 billion.
Bridging the Gap Between a
Great Keynote and Real Results
Washington Speakers Bureau (WSB) has launched the WSB Impact Channel, a
new business unit devoted entirely to helping organizations implement
the strategies offered by its renowned business speakers. WSB Impact
Channel’s Impact Solutions are web-based training programs that teach
organizations how to adapt and implement the business strategies and
management practices offered by luminaries such as Tom Peters, Mike
Abrashoff, Tom Morris, Ann Rhoades, Chip Bell, and Michael Treacy.
“Executives are always asking our speakers, ‘What’s next — how can we
adopt these strategies at our company?’” said WSB’s CEO and founder
Harry Rhoads Jr. “Complementing a powerful keynote with a longer-term
performance improvement program is a natural and effective way to
improve results.” WSB (http://www.WashingtonSpeakers.com)
is the world's No. 1 lecture agency, representing influential world
leaders, business and management experts, motivational speakers, media
personalities, humorists, and sports figures. It is a part of Omnicom
Group Inc. (http://www.omnicomgroup.com).
Author Notes
For information on board development, CEO coaching, and executive team
development, visit the website of Change Leaders Inc., http://www.change-leaders.com.
Marjan Bolmeijer, the founder and CEO of the firm, which specializes in
the above three developmental areas, was the co-author with Change
Leaders’ Aart Pijl of “A Personal Action Plan for the CEO,” published
in the First Quarter 2005 Directors
& Boards.
AlixPartners (http://www.alixpartners.com),
the international corporate turnaround, performance improvement and
financial advisory firm, announced that their successful turnaround
work at client Jarvis PLC, led by Eric Simonsen, a managing director
with the firm, has been awarded the Turnaround Management Association's
2006 "International Turnaround of the Year." Jarvis is a UK-based civil
engineering firm.
Proxy Governance Inc. (http://www.proxygovernance.com),
an independent provider of proxy analysis, automated global voting, and
U.S. compliance services, announced that Philip R. Lochner Jr. has
agreed to serve on the firm's independent Policy Council. The Policy
Council sets the broad policy framework for the firm's proxy voting
policies and reviews the decision-making process of the staff. The
Council also has the authority to review specific proxy recommendations
and recommend reversing them if it believes they are not in the best
interests of increasing long-term shareholder value. Lochner was
commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from 1990
to 1991. He held various positions at Time Warner Inc. including
general counsel, secretary, and chief administrative officer, until he
retired from that company in 1998. He currently serves on the boards of
Adelphia Communications Corp., Apria Healthcare Group Inc., CLARCOR
Inc., CMS Energy Corp. and Solutia Inc.
Back
to the Top

Directors &
Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors &
Boards. All contents copyright 2006, MLR Holdings LLC. |