![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Volume 2, Number 10 • October 2005
|
|||
|
||||
|
Are you reading a pass along copy? Get
your
own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE
and send a blank email. You will be automatically unsubscribed.
Directors & Boards James Kristie Lisa
Cody David Shaw Scott Chase 1845 Walnut Street
|
![]() Now
What? Tips for a Director’s First 100 DaysBe patient, be open-minded, and other recommendations for assimilating effectively onto a board. By Gail R. Meneley and Hugh A. Shields What
Every Corporate Leader Can Learn from the New York YankeesHow does an organization dominate its industry like the Yankees have done with their legendary 80-year winning streak? The secret is a set of 14 principles applicable to the worlds of business and baseball. We know how rare it is for a company to dominate an industry for more than a few years. Customers and technologies change, and new competitors rise up to challenge the great companies that have grown complacent because they thought that the lush days of success would last forever. This makes the Yankee record over the past eight decades all the more amazing. Since 1921, the Yankees have been in the World Series 39 times and have won the championship 26 times. No other team comes close -- the nearest team has won only nine championships. It may not be exaggerating to say that no other team in any sport in history has a comparable long-term record of winning championships. Certainly, being a dominant force for eight decades is a feat achieved by few corporations in American history. Whether you love or hate the Yankees, it is clear to anyone who looks at the history of the team from an objective, business perspective that they are not just another sports team. Something about the Yankee organization enables them to win decade after decade, despite changing players, changing owners, and changing managers. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Dan R. Dalton, Founding Director of the Institute for Corporate Governance and Dean Emeritus, and the Harold A. Poling Chair of Strategic Management in the Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a Directors & Boards
reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase. Futility and risk come immediately to mind. The “futility” is that it is increasingly difficult to avoid the major elements of SOX and listing exchange guidelines--transparency, independence, and accountability. A dozen states or so have adopted or are considering SOX-like guidelines applying to private companies in their jurisdictions, and for non-profits as well. Other federal agencies have adopted SOX-like guidelines that apply to private entities. Consider, too, that private enterprises that have or are seeking government contracts will find that some compliance with SOX-like provisions will be a requirement. There are also a host of risks and derivative costs that apply to private as well as “dark” firms. Raising capital from whatever sources will likely find SOX-like requirements as a condition. Insurance companies will have similar guidelines in place for firms to secure D & O insurance and other coverages. Firms distributing financial statements for virtually any purpose (banks, trustees, institutional investors) will be expected to be SOX-compliant. The acquiree/partner in potential M&A transactions will seek the comfort of SOX-like provisions in the due diligence process. Companies with or considering ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans) may expect that the ESOP’s trustee will encourage SOX-like compliance. And, private/dark companies will want to consider that its clients, joint venture partners, vendors, and other business partners that are publicly traded may insist on compliance with the same practices/guidelines to which they are subject. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Corporate America is taking the increased cost of oil on the chin. Almost half (46%) of the 315 CFOs surveyed in the third quarter “CFO Outlook Survey,” conducted by Financial Executives International and Baruch College’s Zicklin School of Business when the price of oil was more than $70 a barrel, say their companies are absorbing most or all of the additional energy costs. So far, only 7% of all CFOs surveyed say their companies are passing most of the cost along to customers. A significant minority of the surveyed respondents, 29%, say they are not directly affected by high oil prices. These companies were predominantly from service businesses, including communications, technology, banking/finance, health care and consulting. Probably hardest hit by rising oil prices are companies in the manufacturing sector, where 60% say they are absorbing the cost, and another 28% are absorbing half and raising prices to cover the other half. “The corporate cost of higher oil, so far, is being borne predominantly by the companies themselves,” Burton Rothberg, Assistant Professor of Accounting at Baruch College, observed. “As a result, we can expect corporate earnings or capital spending to be affected, at least until prices to customers are increased. Consumers, who are already bearing the brunt of high oil prices at the gas pump and bracing for higher home heating costs, will have more bad news down the road if and when companies decide to pass along more of the costs,” he concluded. About the Survey Full survey results are available www.cfosurveys.com. This quarter, the CFO Outlook Survey, conducted by Financial Executives International and Baruch College’s Zicklin School of Business, interviewed 315 corporate CFOs electronically in late August and early September. CFOs from both public and private companies and from a broad range of industries, revenues, and geographic areas, including some off-shore companies, are represented. Survey respondents are members of Financial Executives International. Financial Executives International (FEI) is the leading advocate for the views of corporate financial management. Its 15,000 members hold policy-making positions as chief financial officers, treasurers, and controllers. FEI enhances member professional development through peer networking, career planning services, conferences, publications, and special reports and research. Members participate in the activities of 86 chapters, 75 of which are in the United States and 11 in Canada. For more information about FEI, visit www.fei.org. Baruch College, founded in 1847, is a senior college of the City University of New York. The Zicklin School of Business at Baruch College is the largest collegiate school of business in the nation, producing graduates who assume leadership positions in all areas of American business as well as conduct important academic research. Baruch has one of the largest accounting programs in the country whose graduates become practicing CPAs.
September
25-27, 2005 October
5-7, 2005 October
6-7, 2005 October
19-21, 2005 October
21, 2005 October
23-25, 2005 October
26-29, 2005 October
28-29, 2005 October
31, 2005 November
1-3, 2005 November
14-15, 2005 December
7-8, 2005 March
27-29, 2006 Bonus
Article Investor
Scrutiny Is Here to StayLinks between governance and performance are prompting more investors to get involved in corporate governance. By James C. Allen Some company executives still seem genuinely surprised—and sometimes annoyed—when investors pay close attention to their company’s governance. These presume that if there are no negative surprises, investors should not concern themselves with such issues as board independence, senior management compensation practices, and director elections. That view is no longer valid in an era of increased scrutiny by investors, who, recognizing the ties between governance and performance, are pushing for more governance reforms that will lead to future gains in profits and share values. This realization by investors is the result of both hard-earned experience and the work of researchers who have mathematically linked profitability and securities price performance to the way companies govern themselves. One 2004 study, conducted on behalf of Institutional Shareholder Services, found that companies with strong governance systems routinely reported returns on investment and equity that were 18.7 percent and 23.8 percent better, respectively, than those of poorly governed firms. This suggests that companies that treat their shareowners openly, honestly, and with respect also are likely to generate goodwill from their customers, suppliers, and employees. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Boardroom
Briefing: Board/Shareholder Communications Our
newest Directors & Boards
Boardroom Briefing, on the subject of Board/Shareholder Communications
is in the mail. This edition is being produced in concert with the National Investor Relations
Institute.To view a pdf of the Boardroom Briefing: Board/Shareholder Communications, click here. To view all of our Boardroom Briefings in .pdf format, click here. Next up, our Boardroom Briefing: Executive Compensation, which will appear in December. Women on Boards ... or, Where Are the Women on Boards? Are women making progress in joining corporate boards? Not by the evidence of a study released in September by an organization of influential women leaders in the Philadelphia region. The Forum of Executive Women’s fifth annual highly respected report, “Women on Boards 2005,” indicates that despite the large pool of qualified female talent, most public companies here have stalled in their efforts to place women and women of color on local corporate boards. In fact, the report shows that while 61 board seats opened up last year, only four were filled by women, and two of those were filled by women of color. The study also reports that Philadelphia companies have made virtually no progress in the number of women in key leadership positions over the past few years. “It is incumbent upon the region’s business leaders to take action towards increasing the number of women on their boards immediately,” said Sharon A. Smith, President of the Forum of Executive Women and chief executive officer of the Girl Scouts of Southeastern Pennsylvania. A copy of the report is available here. Pearl Meyer and Steven E. Hall Form Steven Hall & Partners Pearl Meyer and Steven E. Hall have formed Steven Hall & Partners, a consulting firm focused solely on CEO, senior management and director compensation. Prior to forming the new firm, Meyer and Hall were chairman and president, respectively, of Pearl Meyer & Partners, an executive compensation consultancy they founded in 1989 and which became an operating group of Clark Consulting in 2000. “Effectively motivating corporate leaders is essential to our economy and to shareholders. We have brought together a group of consultants with the experience and independence to meet these challenges,” says Meyer, one of the country’s most recognized experts on CEO and director compensation. Her insights and survey data have appeared many times in Directors & Boards. Author Notes Directors & Boards columnist Gary Sutton has a book coming out in October titled Corporate Canaries: Avoid Business Disasters with a Coalminer’s Secrets. He weaves his business acumen from a career as a turnaround expert with tales of his Irish grandfather’s experiences working the Kentucky coal mines. Back then, canaries dropping dead were the early warning alarm of poisonous fumes; in like fashion, Sutton identifies the value-destroying if not life-ending threats that all businesses should be alert to. The book is being published by Nelson Business, a division of Thomas Nelson Publishers, http://www.thomasnelson.com. Look for an excerpt in the Fourth Quarter 2005 edition of Directors & Boards mailed to subscribers in mid-October. Bob MacDonald, a longtime leader in the insurance industry, keynotes A.M. Best's E Fusion 2005 Conference, being held in Philadelphia Oct. 17-18, 2005 (http://www.efusion2005.com). The conference brings together insurers, technologists, and thought leaders to examine the latest developments in technology and risk. A.M. Best Co., established in 1899, is the world's oldest and most authoritative insurance rating and information source. MacDonald has authored several articles for Directors & Boards, and an excerpt from his new book, Cheat to Win: The Honest Way to Break All the Dishonest Rules in Business (see the D&B e-Briefing, July 2005) will appear in the D&B Fourth Quarter 2005 issue. Willis Group Chairman and CEO Joe Plumeri, subject of the cover story interview for D&B’s Third Quarter 2005 edition (“Joe Plumeri Works the ‘Vision Thing’ at Willis”), was the guest speaker at this year's PricewaterhouseCoopers Briefing at the Reinsurance Rendezvous in Monte Carlo. He called on the industry to recognize the confluence of events impacting the industry as "our defining moment." While giving credit to the New York Attorney General for raising some serious issues, Plumeri indicated that moving the industry forward is more about taking collective responsibility for reforming and even revolutionizing the industry rather than satisfying the demands of regulators. A text of his talk is available here. Back to the Top Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2005, MLR Holdings LLC. |
|||