![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Volume 3, Number 5 • May 2006
|
|||
|
||||
|
Are you reading a pass along copy? Get
your
own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE
and send a blank email. You will be automatically unsubscribed. ![]() ![]() ![]()
James Kristie Lisa
Cody David Shaw Scott Chase Barbara Wenger Jerri Smith 1845 Walnut Street
|
Last Month's Question We’ve
got a hung jury on this question, but thank you for writing and we’ll
look forward to your verdict in the Enron case. ____________________________________________________________________ Director's & Boards ERISA
Webcast/Teleconference ERISA
and Directors: What You Don’t Know Will Hurt You Wayne Miller, President, Denali
Fiduciary Management This webcast/teleconference is free
of charge. Jim
Kristie is the editor and
associate publisher of Directors
& Boards.
Have
You Googled Your CEO Lately?What board members need to know about protecting your CEO, your company, and yourself in the Google universe. By Greg Miller Many board members mistakenly believe that their fiduciary duties come to an end once the plan administration committee is appointed. Editor's note: Wayne Miller, author of the following column, will lead the Directors & Boards webcast, “ERISA and Directors: What You Don’t Know Will Hurt You,” scheduled for May 16, 2006, at 1 p.m. EST. The webcast/teleconference is free of charge. For more information and to register, click here. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) -- the federal law that governs retirement plan management -- does not articulate specific fiduciary governance processes. The absence of a statutory example of retirement plan governance has resulted in dysfunction in the private retirement plan system in this country. Over many years, the lack of a fiduciary governance safe harbor allowed service vendors to heavily influence the development of plan sponsor fiduciary behavior. As might be expected, the influence of non-fiduciary service vendors on the evolution of the retirement industry has been counterproductive to the fiduciary intent of serving as a guardian for long-term trust assets. As a practical matter, dysfunctional fiduciary behavior was irrelevant during much of the 1980s and 1990s. The extended bull market effectively shielded fiduciaries from realizing liability. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Dennis Nally U.S. Chairman and Senior Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a Directors & Boards
reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase. You frequently use golf to illustrate business trends and realities. What makes golf such a great metaphor? One of the biggest problems in the business world today is that too many of us are doing the equivalent of constantly playing the last hole. I believe that we've come to devote so much of our time and attention to dealing with the past that often there aren't enough resources left for the present or future. We've become tied up in rules that are, by design, a reaction to problems of the past. The irony is that business leaders can follow all the rules and still arrive at the wrong answer. Think of the Enron situation. That company’s executives and accountants found precise rules to justify what they were doing as technically right, even though their overall judgment was grievously wrong. A rules-based culture allowed Enron’s leaders to ignore the central tenet of a principles-based system: the principle of simply doing the right thing. History has proven time and time again that rules alone cannot ensure that anyone is doing the right thing. In a recent survey of top senior executives of U.S-based multinational companies, we came upon an interesting and fundamental issue. Seventy-two percent of the executives indicated that the rules-based accounting standards have enabled companies to design financial engineering techniques around specific accounting objectives, rather than broad economic goals. In corporate governance, as in my profession, rules can tolerate a shirking of corporate and personal responsibility that principles will not. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] But Survey Finds Only Half Expect U.S. Economy to Improve this Year Two-thirds (66 percent) of corporate America’s finance leaders are bullish about the future performance of their companies, as their increased confidence in the pricing outlook offsets the threat of myriad higher costs, led by energy prices and employee healthcare. However, chief financial officers and comptrollers are less confident about the prospects for the overall U.S. economy in 2006. Indeed, just 51 percent predict that the U.S. economy will improve this year while 39 percent expect it to remain the same and 9 percent say it will worsen. At the same time, nearly six in 10 (58 percent) senior financial executives expect inflation to increase in 2006 compared to 37 percent who say it will remain the same. Just 4 percent expect inflation to decrease. One red flag is the potential for the federal debt to balloon significantly. While more than three-quarters (77 percent) of companies do not expect to cut healthcare benefits to retirees in the next 12 months, a full 17 percent of financial executives do anticipate cutting benefits in the coming year. These cuts are coming despite massive subsidies in the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act to encourage companies to maintain their retiree healthcare benefits, such as those for prescription drugs. As companies drop these plans, retirees turn to Medicare, driving up federal costs. These are among the key findings from the Grant Thornton LLP Survey of Senior Finance Executives, which polled 122 chief financial officers and comptrollers at companies ranging in size from more than $2 billion in annual revenues to less than $50 million in annual revenues. One reason so many companies expect to post stronger results in 2006 is their increased pricing power. Two-thirds (66 percent) say their companies will raise prices this year while one-third (33 percent) don’t expect to increase their prices or fees. In June, 2005, just 44 percent anticipated that their companies would raise prices or fees in the coming six months. Of those CFOs and comptrollers expecting to raise prices in 2006, 59 percent say their company’s price increase will be less than 5 percent while 41 say their prices will rise more than 5 percent. Despite the improved pricing outlook for many companies, senior finance executives are busy trying to minimize the impact of rising costs. While 60 percent say higher energy prices will not weaken their financial results in 2006, 39 percent of CFOs and comptrollers say they will hurt performance. That compares to 74 percent in June, 2005 who expected higher energy prices to weaken their company’s performance in the second half. Two out of three (66 percent) finance executives also expect another double-digit increase in employee healthcare costs this year, although 32 percent do not. As a result, the outlook for workers is mixed. Companies are about evenly split on hiring plans. Fifty-one percent say they will increase the rate of hiring in 2006 while 48 percent say their companies will not. About the survey Commissioned by Grant Thornton LLP, the survey was conducted during February and March 2006, with responses from 122 CFOs and senior comptrollers at public and private companies with revenues ranging from less than $50 million to more than $2 billion. Grant Thornton LLP is the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International, one of the six global accounting, tax and business advisory organizations. Visit Grant Thornton LLP at http://www.grantthornton.com.
May 3,
2006 May 3-5,
2006 May 16,
2006 May
16-19, 2006 May
18-19, 2006 May
18-19, 2006 May 25,
2006 May
30-June 2, 2006 May
31-June 2, 2006 June 1-2,
2006 June 1-3,
2006 June 6,
2006 June 7-8,
2006 June 13,
2006 June
20-21, 2006 On Board Bootcamp puts on “Would you like to become a Corporate Director?” -- an insider’s guide on how to be selected and an introduction to experienced directors and search executives who will share with you “lessons learned” along the way. Susan Stautberg, president of PartnerCom Corp., which creates and manages advisory boards and conducts corporate director searches, has partnered with Carolyn Chin, a board chair and director of five companies, to launch On Board Bootcamp. This seminar is designed to benefit those who: are already on a nonprofit or small company board and would like to be selected by a larger one; are about to become a board member; would like to be selected for a board; would like to establish an action plan for getting on boards in the future. For a brochure and more information contact The Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. has expanded its portfolio of products, services, and information designed to support Nasdaq-listed companies in the area of governance. Nasdaq has begun to make Institutional Shareholder Services’ Corporate Governance Quotient (CGQ) ratings available to listed companies through its issuer-focused website, Nasdaq Online. Nasdaq-listed companies will be able to view ISS’s CGQ industry and index scores via Nasdaq Online using their proprietary log-in and password. Introduced in 2002, the CGQ is a widely followed rating system, covering more than 8,000 companies worldwide, that assesses governance structures and protocols. For more information on Nasdaq Corporate Services, visit http://www.nasdaq.net. FAQs on ERM Protiviti Inc., a provider of risk consulting and internal audit services, has released “Guide to Enterprise Risk Management: Frequently Asked Questions.” The guide offers detailed insights, ideas, and strategies for C-level executives and boards of directors responsible for ERM design and implementation within their organizations. "Our objective is to bring clarity to the dialogue around ERM,” says Everett Gibbs, managing director of Protiviti. Visit http://www.protiviti.com to download a complimentary PDF of the guide, or call 888-556-7420. Additional ERM guidance can be gained from the Directors & Boards Boardroom Briefing on “Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery,” published last month. You can download a PDF copy of this special report here. New Board Leadership for NIRI The National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) has elected Maureen Wolff-Reid as the 2006-2007 chairman of the NIRI board of directors. Wolff-Reid, 47, is president of the Boston-based investor relations agency Sharon Merrill Associates Inc. She succeeds Mary Dunbar, senior vice president, investor relations, at Dix & Eaton. "I look forward to working with the board and NIRI staff to enhance the recognition of investor relations as a critical strategic management responsibility that operates in accordance with the highest legal and ethical standards,” Wolff-Reid states. She joined Sharon Merrill Associates upon its founding in 1985 and was promoted to president in 1997. She spearheads the agency's business development and advises clients on issues including M&A communications, corporate message development, earnings guidance, investor targeting, and crisis management. NIRI is the professional association of corporate officers and investor relations consultants responsible for communications among corporate management, shareholders, security analysts, and other financial publics, http://www.niri.org. Its 4,200 members represent over 2,100 publicly held companies in the United States. Author Notes Donald Delves, founder and principal of The Delves Group (http://www.delvesgroup.com), has composed a checklist designed to provide a basic overview of the new SEC requirements on executive compensation disclosure. He advises that it “should serve as a reference tool throughout the year,” explaining that the proposed changes to executive compensation disclosure rules “matter just as much today as they will when you draft your proxies at the beginning of next year. That’s because under the current SEC proposal, the pay-related decisions made today must be disclosed and explained in your 2007 proxy Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section.” Given that the “why” and “how” of compensation decisions are expected to become as important as the “how much,” he adds that board members and executives “should familiarize themselves with the proposed requirements and keep them in mind throughout the year as pay programs are evaluated, amended, and approved.” Delves authored the article, “Why Retired CEOs Can Be a Board’s MVPs” in the First Quarter 2006 edition of Directors & Boards. Click here for a PDF copy of the checklist. Directors & Boards Editor James Kristie has joined the advisory board of the Center for Leadership in Governance. The center has been formed by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the Washington, D.C.-based national association representing nearly 1,300 member companies that provide health benefits to more than 200 million Americans, http://www.ahip.org. The center will provide AHIP members with the tools they need to comply with governance-related regulations and directives and to more fully engage their board members and keep them abreast of industry trends and best practices in the governance area. Kristie has also been named to the advisory council of Temple University Press, one of the nation’s preeminent university book publishers, http://www.temple.edu/tempress. TU Press was an early publisher of books in urban studies, housing and labor studies, organizational reform, health care, and public religion. Newer fields that it is establishing leadership in include disability studies, animal rights, criminology, gender and sexual identity, and sports and society. It publishes 50-60 books a year. In recognition of its leadership position, three of its books were just named "Outstanding Academic Titles" for 2005 -- a highly selective designation by Choice magazine, an influential publication of the American Library Association. Kristie is an adjunct faculty member of Temple University, teaching in its School of Communications and Theater. Back to the Top Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2006, MLR Holdings LLC. |
|||