![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Volume 2, Number 5 • May 2005
|
|||
|
||||
|
Are you reading a pass along copy? Get
your
own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE
and send a blank email. You will be automatically unsubscribed. James Kristie Lisa
Cody David Shaw Scott Chase 1845 Walnut Street
|
IMPORTANT!
If you
haven't completed your D&B survey on corporate internal
investigations, please click here. Deadline for completion is
today, and we appreciate your input.
A look at independent director liability insurance and the added protection it offers. By Stephen J. Weiss and Shannon A.G. Knotts The Webb Report, that is. Just the facts, ma’am -- to be read with care. By Hoffer Kaback In the 1950s TV series “Dragnet,” most episodes contained an early scene in which a crime witness (or victim) tried to explain to the main character, LAPD Det. Sgt. Joe Friday, what had happened. Almost invariably, that citizen rambled in the telling. And so Friday, played by Jack Webb, would issue a laconic instruction, which quickly became a catchphrase in popular culture. Webb would drily tell the witness (almost always a woman) to report “Just the facts, ma’am.” Fifty years later, we consider a different Webb report -- this one by Dan Webb to the New York Stock Exchange. This Webb report pertains to Richard A. Grasso, ex-chairman of the NYSE. In late September 2003, the exchange, a not-for-profit entity, retained Webb’s law firm, Winston & Strawn, to investigate how it came to pass that Grasso had received a payout of some $140 million in deferred compensation and benefits and was to receive an additional $48 million in deferred comp and benefits through 2007. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Robert P. Schweihs Managing Director Willamette Management Associates
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a Directors & Boards
reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase. There has been a lot written recently about the reasonableness of executive compensation. Why is this issue so high-profile, and is this issue primarily of concern only to public corporations? One reason this issue is so high-profile is the publicity surrounding recent corporate scandals, including the perceived abusive compensation practices at many publicly traded companies. Shareholders are understandably concerned. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in recent years has aggressively challenged (1) the deductibility of “excessive” executive compensation for closely held C corporations and (2) the avoidance of payroll-related taxes by S corporations due to unreasonably low executive compensation. There are many reasons why reasonableness of executive compensation is of concern to both public and privately held corporations. This is also an important topic to the boards of directors of not-for-profit organizations related to private inurement issues. What are some of those reasons? For a privately held corporation (either an S corporation or a C corporation), the reasonableness of executive compensation is of interest principally to the IRS. For the closely held S corporation, the IRS is typically concerned with whether shareholder/employees are paid an unreasonably low level of executive compensation. This is because unreasonably low levels of S corporation shareholder/employee compensation are not subject to FICA, Medicare, FUTA, SUTA, and other compensation-related employment taxes. Instead of being paid reasonable levels of compensation, S corporation shareholder/employees often “pay” themselves by taking periodic S corporation income distributions. Since these income distributions do not qualify as wages, they are not subject to the above-mentioned employment taxes. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] According to a study by Paul D. Broude and Richard L. Prebil of Foley & Lardner, LLP, presented at the 2005 National Directors Institute, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act continues to have a significant impact on private organizations as 87% of survey respondents felt that SOX or other corporate governance reform requirements have impacted their organizations compared to 77% in 2004. The impact of corporate governance reform on non-profit organizations was even more apparent as 97% of non-profits responding to the survey felt that corporate governance reform had impacted their organizations compared to 80% of for-profit organizations. More than three-quarters (78%) of the private organizations surveyed have self-imposed corporate governance reforms, compared to 60% of respondents in 2004. When the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was adopted, the Congressional record indicated that it was not intended to apply to any organization other than public companies. At that time, many claimed that regardless of the intent of Congress, these guidelines would eventually permeate all businesses under the guise of best practices. Although an unintended consequence, the verbatim responses we received indicate this is in fact happening. Many of the aspects of corporate governance reform currently being adopted by private organizations are those that are relatively inexpensive to implement and include CEO/CFO financial statement certification, appointment of independent directors, adopting a corporate ethical code, establishing whistle blower procedures, and approval of non-audit services by the board. However, it remains to be seen whether Section 404 audits of internal financial controls are adopted by these organizations as a best practice, as these audits are generally expensive and time-consuming to implement. Government entities, at both the state and federal level, have not yet had the impact one might anticipate on private organizations, including non-profits. However, based on the verbatim responses received, many survey respondents are implementing corporate governance reforms in anticipation of eventual federal or state requirements. The private organizations responding to the survey generally believe in the principles guiding corporate governance regulation and in many areas are increasingly adopting corporate governance reforms as best practices. However, the smaller organizations responding to our survey (those with under $300M in revenue or annual budget) are more likely to choose not to adopt the higher-cost elements of corporate governance reform. A pdf of the study is available here.
May 10,
2005 May
18-19, 2005 May
19-20, 2005 May
31-June 3, 2005 June 1-2,
2005 June 2-4,
2005 June 2-4,
2005 June 7,
2005 June 8-9,
2005 June 9,
2005 June
19-21, 2005 Boardroom
Briefing: Corporate Internal Investigtions Author News Joe Plumeri, chairman and CEO of Willis Group Holdings and the subject of the cover story interview in the Directors & Boards Third Quarter 2004 issue, delivered the keynote address at the annual membership meeting of the Risk and Insurance Management Society on April 18, 2005. From the themes put forward in that speech, Willis has issued “The Leadership Moment,” a white paper detailing a new model for the insurance industry. The paper is available on the global insurance broker’s Web site at http://www.willis.com/Extras/RIMSNews.aspx. David A. Nadler, chairman of Mercer Delta Consulting, is a 2005 recipient of The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology’s (SIOP) Distinguished Professional Contributions Award. The award is given to professionals whose efforts and contributions to the Industrial-Organizational (I-O) psychology field have had a significant and measurable impact on both the people and the development/implementation of practices involved in the I-O setting. Dr. Nadler, who consults at the CEO and board level and specializes in the areas of large-scale organizational change, executive leadership, organization design, and senior team development, is well known for his research and writing in the I-O field. He has has authored and/or edited 14 books, including Organizational Architecture and Champions of Change, and he and his Mercer Delta colleagues have written several articles for Directors & Boards. Harry Edelson was the keynote speaker for the National Venture Forum’s Private Equity 2005 conference. Described in the conference materials as “one of the world’s most successful venture capital investors,” Edelson is managing partner of Edelson Technology Partners, based in Woodcliff Lake, N.J., http://www.edelsontech.com. He has been a columnist for Directors & Boards and has written several major articles for the journal, including “Problems with Boards of Small Companies” (Fall 1994), which was designated one of D&B’s “20 Classic” articles in the journal’s special 20th anniversary edition published in 1996. Pam Farr, president and COO of the Cabot Advisory Group, died April 12, 2005, after what was described by Cabot Chairman and CEO Steven Darien as a “valiant effort to surmount complications from transplant surgery.” She helped found Cabot Advisory Group http://www.cabotgrp.com, a firm that provides a range of high-level strategy and human resource services, and was both an author herself as well as a facilitator of several Cabot-contributed articles for Directors & Boards. She will be missed by many in the HR field and governance community because, as Darien notes, she was “extremely generous with her time serving on corporate, university and nonprofit boards.” New Directors Roster Additions We present a preview of six of the directors to be featured in our next Directors Roster, appearing in the Third Quarter 2005 edition of Directors & Boards. Edited by Kelly McCarthy. Saflink Corp Asa Hutchinson A
founding member of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In 2003
was confirmed by the Senate as the nation’s first Under Secretary of
Border and Transportation Security, responsible for more than 100,000
federal employees. During his tenure he initiated modernized
border
inspections and the development of a biometric entry-exit system for
foreign visitors to the U.S. Previously led the U.S. Drug Enforcement
Agency. From 1995-2001 represented Arkansas in the U.S. House of
Representatives. From 1990-1995 served as chairman of the Arkansas
Republican Party. In 1982, he was appointed by President Reagan as the
U.S. Attorney for Western Arkansas, making him the youngest to hold
that position in the country. Formerly spent a 21-year career as an
attorney in Arkansas. Age 55.Saflink provides software security products. Revenues are $5 million. [Click Here to Read More Roster Listings] Back to the Top Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2005, MLR Holdings LLC. |
|||