![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Volume 6, Number 12 • December 2009
|
|||
|
||||
|
Are you reading a pass along copy? Get
your
own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE
and send a blank email. You will be automatically unsubscribed. ![]()
James Kristie Lisa
Cody David Shaw Scott Chase Barbara Wenger Jerri Smith 1845 Walnut Street
|
Jim
Kristie is the editor and
associate publisher of Directors
& Boards. ***** Special Note: On
January 20, at 2pm EST, I will be moderating a special Directors & Boards Webinar on
the topic of "Enterprise Reinvention: How Directors Can
Elevate and Sustain Corporate Performance Through Enterprise Risk
Management." My speakers will be Jack Bergstrand, the
author of Reinvent Your Enterprise,
and the founder of Brand Velocity, Inc., and John A. Wheeler, the
managing principal of Weelhouse Advisors LLC, and the former senior
vice president and senior risk offier within the corporate risk
management division of SunTrust banks, Inc. This webinar
will provide an exploration—from an enterprise perspective—on how to
transcend outdated “siloed” management approaches and become more
systematic in the rapidly changing global environment. To
register for this free webinar, click here: http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=64478
Dangerous Currents Here is what can prompt even ordinary people to do bad things, and what board members must watch like hawks to avoid ethical catastrophe. By Thomas Donaldson Editor’s Note: Among its 2009 Faculty Pioneer Awards recipients, the Aspen Institute Center for Business Education presented Thomas Donaldson with the Lifetime Achievement Award. Dubbed the “Oscars of the business school world” by the Financial Times, this annual recognition celebrates business school instructors who have demonstrated leadership and risk-taking in integrating social, environmental and ethical issues into the MBA curriculum. This year’s winners were honored on November 6 at an awards breakfast at Ernst & Young’s corporate headquarters in New York. Prof. Donaldson wrote a very popular article for Directors & Boards in 2004 titled “Dangerous Currents” – in which he analyzed six factors that contribute to “almost every major corporate ethical disaster.” The following excerpt from the article addresses two of those factors. Click here for a copy of the full article. I think I know what causes most corporate ethical disasters, and it’s not what many business leaders believe. First, let's establish what doesn't prompt most corporate ethical disasters, despite popular views. Most such disasters are not caused by the failure of either compliance systems or codes of ethics. When I testified in the Senate during the Sarbanes-Oxley hearings, I had to remind senators that virtually all the corporations that fell from grace — the Enrons, WorldComs, and Tycos — had sophisticated compliance programs and sophisticated codes of ethics. Jeffrey Skilling, of Enron infamy, was regarded widely as the man who beefed up compliance at Enron. Nor are most corporate ethical disasters caused by ethical greed-heads. To attribute the recent spate of corporate scandals to a few bad apples is unconscionably naïve. To read more, click the link below. [Click
Here to Read
the Entire Article]
The gritty stuff Heard this in your governance seminars or RiskMetrics grading sessions? By Gary Sutton I’ve successfully sat through several seminars for board members, and actually stayed awake through most. My public companies earned ISS points for my attendance (yeah, team). None of these seminars touched on the gritty stuff that makes a board work. Here’s what makes them not work: 1. Too Much Diversity: Getting an Asian, a woman, a professor, and other window-dressing board members slows down meetings — unless each has been a CEO. How can you advise if you’ve never experienced the relentless pressure of improving cash flow and earnings quarter after quarter? How about an Indian, a handicapped person, and a professor with that P&L background? Super! Recruit them. Just know that they’re already highly sought after as board members, and should be. 2. Dinner Before the Meeting: This common social gathering serves little purpose. Have a dinner after the meeting. Then you can leisurely dig into issues that arose during the business day. Dinner before requires holding back some information; otherwise, why have the meeting? Boards are about business, not being pals. To read more, click the link below. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] David Jaffe Partner and Corporate Governance Attorney Fox Rothschild LLP, Pittsburgh
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a
Directors & Boards reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase. For board directors of insolvent corporations seeking restructuring alternatives, what are the top risks to avoid? In this recession, with the absence of fully functioning credit markets, companies face an array of sub-optimal choices in the struggle to survive. The pressure will continue unabated for the foreseeable future. In this new “normal” environment, investors, creditors and other corporate stakeholders who have suffered financial losses are likely to attempt to hold directors accountable for ignoring warning signals, taking undue risks and engaging in reckless behavior. If any form of director self-dealing or conflict of interest is implicated, the risk to corporate decision-makers increases. Directors, officers and their advisors need to be proactive in minimizing such risk. In short, stakeholders who were once colleagues in the enterprise now are rivals. The cracks in the façade lay bare a multitude of conflicting interests among creditors, shareholders, employees, management and directors. As boards deliberate over restructuring, they begin to realize that there are no “win/win” options and that their decisions are likely to be challenged in court. What is the basic legal standard of review of director conduct? Directors have a legal obligation to manage a corporation’s business and affairs in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believe to be in its best interests. In fulfilling this function, directors are viewed as company fiduciaries and must fulfill two essential duties – loyalty and care. In discharging those duties, directors generally are insulated from judicial second-guessing by a legal doctrine known as the “business judgment” rule (BJR). The BJR protects disinterested corporate directors from liability for corporate acts or omissions through a presumption that they have exercised due care and loyalty and acted in the company’s best interests. To read more, click the link below. [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] While the worst of the financial crisis's impact on their firms may be behind them, most finance executives remain concerned about several financial and risk management issues, most notably cash and cash flow, and defined benefit (DB) pension plan volatility, according to a recent survey conducted by global professional services firm Towers Perrin. When ranking the importance of certain activities they will be considering over the next six to 12 months, 81% of respondents said cash flow was important or essential. More than three-fourths of respondents (77%) listed earnings, followed by revenue (74%), liquidity (72%) and market share growth (37%). Further, most executives said they still expect to be focusing on capital and liquidity a year from now. Fifty-three percent said they expect a long-term need to optimize liquidity levels, followed by the need to invest in businesses to create growth (50%) and to reduce cash-flow volatility (41%). Towers Perrin cited the “very important/essential” rating given by many survey respondents for receivables and credit risk and suggested three reasons:
If the financial crisis has heightened the awareness of cash-flow concerns, its effect on executives’ apprehension around DB pension plan volatility is also acute. Fifty-four percent reported an increased level of concern around pension plan volatility, more than such highly publicized issues as risk management, access to short- and long-term financing, and executive compensation. However, survey findings indicate that only about one-third of the respondents have changed pension plan investment strategy as a result of the financial turmoil, and even fewer (12%) have changed pension plan hedging policies. Cash flow concerns are somewhat higher because of the minimum funding requirements mandated by the U.S. Pension Protection Act. Nearly 70% of respondents attached some degree of importance to managing pension-related funding needs over the next six to 12 months, with more than one-quarter saying it was very important or essential. From a risk management perspective, 61% of respondents said pension risk management needs at least a little improvement, and another 10% think a lot of improvement is needed. Among some of the other key survey findings:
About the survey Conducted between October 6 and October 26, 2009, Towers Perrin latest survey gathered responses from 133 U.S. corporate finance executives, exploring their views on several financial and risk management topics as they relate to the current financial crisis.
Korn/Ferry International reported in November a 400 percent increase in its engagements with corporate boards of directors on CEO succession planning consulting projects for the first six months of its current fiscal year. This is more than twice the number of succession planning projects in the prior two years combined. Korn/Ferry says the firm is currently working on more than 25 CEO succession planning projects for a variety of clients in the public sector across multiple industries. Korn/Ferry believes this significant increase is due to corporate boards responding to:
Recent Korn/Ferry studies show that while corporate boards consider CEO succession to be one of their most important jobs, only approximately half currently have a succession plan in place. Director Resources Say on Pay: As momentum builds in Congress to require that all public companies offer their shareholders an advisory vote on executive pay, a new 2009 Say on Pay Survey from independent compensation consultants Pearl Meyer & Partners offers an in-depth look at how 231 respondents across a range of industries are approaching this major new governance initiative. Click here for a link to the survey. Executive Pay: Chief executive officers at the nation’s largest companies saw the value of their company stock ownership plunge last year as the U.S. equities market declined, according to an annual study by Watson Wyatt released last month. The study found that the total value of CEO stock ownership and outstanding equity awards and bonus payouts for CEOs decreased by 42 percent in 2008, which is larger than the 34 percent decline experienced by a typical shareholder at those companies. Click here to view the 2009/2010 Report on Executive Pay. Risk Management: The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies has added a new tool to ChubbWorks, its online employment practices loss prevention resource for commercial and not-for-profit customers. HR Acuity On-Demand provides organizations with: a tracking component to help pinpoint recurring misconduct problems; a five-step methodology for conducting investigations into allegations of employee misconduct; and readily available documentation to assist in producing objective, defendable results, if needed. Chubb EPL customers can access HR Acuity On-Demand for a reduced fee for their first year’s subscription; in addition, Chubb will reimburse a portion of the annual fee for as long as the customer subscribes to this service. Click here to register for ChubbWorks. Financial Reporting: To help business leaders prepare now for the expected challenges of adopting international financial reporting standards, Protiviti Inc., a global business consulting and internal audit firm, has released the Guide to International Financial Reporting Standards: Frequently Asked Questions. Click here to access a complimentary copy. Investor Relations: Thomson Reuters has released its biennial IR Best Practices Study—2009 IR Best Practices. More than 500 companies participated. Among the findings: IR budgets are shrinking but only slightly; IROs are taking on more responsibility; the role of the sell-side is diminishing; and comfort in dealing with hedge funds and activists is on the rise. The State of Boards: The Spencer Stuart Board Index for 2009, a comprehensive study of U.S. boards, directors, director compensation, and board-level issues, has been released. The 2009 index looks at how boards have changed in the past 10 years and reveals several important governance changes in advance of proposed legislative reforms. Author Notes National Insurance Partners has acquired Retirement Capital Group, one of the nation’s leading executive compensation and benefit plan providers headquartered in San Diego, California, with additional offices in Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Boston, Chicago and Atlanta. RCG was founded in 2002 by William MacDonald, a renowned expert in the executive benefits industry. NIP is a Texas-based risk management, executive compensation and benefits and corporate governance firm with offices in Houston, Austin, Dallas and San Antonio. The firm specializes in board of director/trustee protection, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, property and casualty insurance, risk management, executive compensation consulting and executive and employee benefits. NIP's chairman and founder, Bill Pollock, is a regular contributor to Directors & Boards. Raj Gupta, who stepped down as chairman and CEO of Rohm & Haas Corp. upon the closing of the company’s acquisition by Dow Chemical Co. earlier this year, has been named to the board of Delphi as the auto parts supplier emerges from bankruptcy. Gupta was the subject of the cover story in the third quarter 2009 edition of Directors & Boards in which he reviewed the details of the sale of Rohm & Haas and the board governance behind the transaction. EdgeRock Realty Advisors, an independent investment banking firm dedicated exclusively to the real estate sector, has been formed by a joint venture between FTI Consulting, a global business advisory firm dedicated to helping companies protect and enhance enterprise value, and Compass Advisers LLP, a leading investment banking and financial advisory firm. EdgeRock will advise global real estate companies, owners and institutional investors worldwide on M&A and divestiture transactions, private capital raising, and IPO and other capital markets strategies and transactions. Serving as co-CEOs of EdgeRock are Bruce Schonbraun, currently the head of the global real estate practice and a member of the executive committee of FTI Consulting, and the group head of real estate of The Schonbraun McCann Group (acquired by FTI in 2008), and Stephen Waters, founder and managing partner at Compass Advisers. In response to a growing need for boards to use independent consultants for advice on executive compensation matters, a team of six industry veterans from Mercer’s Human Capital consulting practice have formed Compensation Advisory Partners LLC. The new firm is being led by senior partners Peter Chingos and Rosie Marie Orens. Alice Kane, general counsel of North America for Zurich Financial Services Group, was the special guest of honor for the Tourette Syndrome Association Dinner Dance 2009, held on Nov. 12 at New York’s Pierre Hotel. Back to the Top Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2009, MLR Holdings LLC. |
|||