![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Volume 5, Number 8 • August 2008
|
|||
|
||||
|
Are you reading a pass along copy? Get
your
own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE
and send a blank email. You will be automatically unsubscribed. ![]()
James Kristie Lisa
Cody David Shaw Scott Chase Barbara Wenger Jerri Smith 1845 Walnut Street
|
Jim
Kristie is the editor and
associate publisher of Directors
& Boards.
The Perils of Entering into
NegotiationsBe very careful and very selective. There are lots of reasons to reject propositions of interest. By David Wanetick “There is no harm in entering into a dialogue.” That is a common refrain in the boardroom. So too is, “We have nothing to lose by negotiating. If we don’t like the deal, we can always walk away later.” Far too often, when it comes to negotiations, nothing could be further from the truth. Some negotiations are unavoidable. And negotiations are an imperative step in actualizing a company’s business plan. However, negotiations are not cost free. Negotiations are a tax on a company’s resources, represent a diversion of focus, and heighten your company’s vulnerability to competition. While we advise companies on developing a range of negotiating strategies, the first strategic question that should be addressed is, “Should we entertain the proposition?” Here are some reasons why you should reject unessential opportunities to negotiate: [Click
Here to Read
the Entire Article]
Understand the Cash A board may be comfortable that the company has the resources to withstand a storm. Turnaround pros may come to a different conclusion. By Deborah Hicks Midanek In almost 30 years of working with troubled companies, I have never yet seen a company that has a good understanding of its cash. Executive time is typically spent on important bank and capital market relationships, and on financial reporting. Cash management is typically a clerical function, not part of regular management scrutiny. The board, not burdened with daily running the business, can assist on this, and through this continuing process help both management and board better understand the company’s business dynamics. Greater understanding of the critical drivers of cash through the business leads to greater confidence when the unexpected inevitably occurs. How to do this? [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] David Kollat Founder and President 22 Inc.
Editor's note: Each month, we ask a
Directors & Boards reader to comment on critical issues facing
directors today. If you'd like to participate in this section in
the future, please email Scott
Chase. As a long-time serving board member on NYSE and NASDAQ companies, what do you see as the greatest challenge to directors and board members over the next 3-5 years? To make certain that the company on whose board you are serving has a reasonable strategy, and the right strategic capabilities, capital structure, and people resources to deal with the future that it faces. This is likely to be unusually challenging given the uncertain economic conditions, a complex set of domestic issues, and potentially explosive geo-political scenarios. Has board service becomes less attractive and more risky on an individual/personal basis over the last 10 years? Board service has become more interesting and challenging as the rate of change has accelerated and things have become more complex. The level of expectations regarding boards has risen, which has resulted in increased risk relative to the past. However, if a board member, and the board collectively, are doing their job with the appropriate degree of comprehensiveness, rigor, thoughtfulness, and prudence, the degree of risk is tolerable. Overall, this is the most exciting time to be on boards that I have experienced over the last 30 years. Are you concerned that “the next generation” of board members is prepared strategically and tactically to assist companies in their growth and expansion? Research indicates that the longer our students are in school.... [Click Here to Read the Entire Article] Current Economic Conditions Increase Risks According to the latest Chubb Private Company Risk Survey, 37% of U.S. companies do not purchase any type of management liability/professional liability insurance. The majority of survey participants do not purchase employment practices liability (63%), crime (66%), directors and officers liability (63%) and cyber liability (91%) insurance. One in three of the companies that do not purchase employment practices liability, crime and directors and officers liability insurance cite “low risk/no exposure” as the reason; one in two companies do not purchase cyber liability insurance for the same reason. Participants also were less concerned in 2007 than in 2005 about the potential financial damage caused by lawsuits filed for wrongful termination, discrimination or sexual harassment (23% vs. 43%), employee/retiree benefit issues (11% vs. 18%) and directors and officers liability issues (5% vs. 9%). Yet, two out of three (62%) U.S. private companies have experienced some type of event related to management/professional liability in the past five years, including workplace crime (32%), employment practices liability (24%) and directors and officers liability (22%). In 2008, one in three (31%) companies expect to experience a crime-related event, 26% a directors and officers liability incident and 19% an employment practices liability incident. Private company executives indicated their firms are likely to broaden product offerings (47%), reduce workforce size (28%), outsource functions or operations (25%), reduce or eliminate some employee benefits (20%) and/or make a major acquisition (19%) this year. In 2008, one-third of the survey participants anticipated tighter access to credit. Employment Practices Liability Risks Surge Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claims today are at their highest level since 2002, and each charge category—discrimination, harassment, retaliation, etc.—has increased by double digits since 2006. Survey respondents indicated that in 2008 their organizations would reduce the workforce (28%), outsource functions or operations (25%) and reduce or eliminate some employee benefits (20%). According to Chubb’s survey, the average total cost, including judgments, settlements, fines and legal fees, of an employment practices liability-related event is $63,114. Only 37% of companies with 50 to 249 employees purchase employment practices liability insurance, compared to 51% of companies with 250 or more employees. Economic Conditions Spur Employee Crime According to the 2006 report by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, U.S. organizations lose an estimated 5% of annual revenues to fraud, and businesses with fewer than 100 employees suffered a median fraud loss of $190,000. Employee crime cost companies in Chubb’s survey as much as $250,000 D&O Liability Litigation Costs Increase In 2008, one in four respondents believed it is likely that their company will experience a D&O-related event. According to the recent Chubb survey, the average cost to defend and indemnify a directors and officers liability lawsuit is $393,017, up from $308,475 in 2005. The survey reported that only 24% of respondents had a published corporate governance program or planned to have one this year, down from 44% in 2005. Only 24% of respondents have or plan to implement Sarbanes Oxley compliance in 2008. Cyber Liability Remains a Threat The 2007 CSI Computer Crime and Security Survey notes that 46% of companies had experienced one or more security incidents in the past 12 months; the average reported loss increased to $350,424 from $168,000 the previous year. In the United States, where 35 states currently require notification of a security breach, the Ponemon Institute, a privacy and information management research firm, reports that costs run as high as $197 per record, an increase of 43% from 2005. About the Survey Pollara, a public opinion and market research firm in Canada, conducted the Chubb Private Company Risk Survey in late 2007. The firm interviewed specialty insurance decision-makers at 469 U.S. for-profit companies. Chubb also sponsored the survey in 2005 and 2003. About Chubb The member insurers of the Chubb Group of Insurance Companies form a multi-billion dollar organization providing property and casualty insurance for personal and commercial customers worldwide through 8,500 independent agents and brokers. Chubb's global network includes branches and affiliates throughout North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and Australia. ![]() August
13-15, 2008 September
8-10, 2008 September
9, 2008 September
14-17, 2008
September
22, 2008 September
24-26, 2008 The Boardroom Bound® Boardology™ Institute presents their Pipeline Seminar in New York. Register online at http://www.boardroombound.biz. October
13-15, 2008 October
19-21, 2008 October
21-22, 2008
The majority of senior executives don't agree with enforcing mandatory retirement on CEOs, according to a survey by BlueSteps, the career management services of the Association of Executive Search Consultants. Of the 398 respondents polled 17% indicated CEOs should retire by age 65, with another 10% saying that CEOs should retire by age 70. Perhaps considering their own future, 67% opposed a mandatory retirement age for CEOs. According to AESC President Peter Felix, ageism will remain a constant issue, especially in light of the current U.S. presidential election. "I think we'll see ageism under the spotlight as the U.S. electorate considers a candidate over 70," Felix notes. “Age is the last slippery slope for CEOs. But can we really draw a clear line and say that a CEO is competent at 64 but not at 65? There are a lot of great CEOs over age 60 and more may be needed as the war for talent increases in intensity.” An article by Felix, titled “The Superdelegate to the Shareholders,” about the board’s role in picking a new CEO, appears in the Third Quarter issue of Directors & Boards, mailing to subscribers this month. NACD Selects Director of the Year The National Association of Corporate Directors will honor Andrew J. McKenna, nonexecutive chairman at McDonald’s Corp. and lead director of Aon Corp., as 2008 NACD Director of the Year. At McDonald’s, according to a statement by the NACD, “Mr. McKenna has earned great respect as chairman for his strong leadership through very turbulent times. The untimely passing of two CEOs in the early 2000s came as a hard hit to the company’s board. Mr. McKenna demonstrated great compassion during these events and his pragmatic leadership helped keep the board focused on business objectives. Instrumental in the board’s CEO succession plan, it held up through these ultimate tests. He has also taken the lead on several occasions within McDonald’s Corp. to identify executives for outside board positions and recruit talent for McDonald’s own board.” Another NACD honor, the B. Kenneth West Lifetime Achievement Award, will be presented to John C. Whitehead. Per the NACD: “As a corporate director, business pioneer, and outstanding citizen, Mr. Whitehead has achieved in his lifetime more than most people would likely believe. For over 60 years, he has enjoyed a remarkable career as both a public servant and private industry leader. His contributions to the development of corporate governance are equally exceptional.” John Whitehead is a former member of the editorial advisory board of Directors & Boards. He was featured in a cover story in the Third Quarter 2005 edition. The awards will be presented Oct. 20 during an awards banquet that is part of the NACD 2008 Annual Corporate Governance Conference, Oct. 19-21 in Washington, D.C. Director Resources Compensation Regulatory Matters: Want a heads up on legislation to watch affecting pay and benefits? Visit the blog of Cara Welch, WorldatWork’s Washington-based director of public policy, responsible for anticipating and addressing regulations and legislation that could affect pay and rewards programs. Compliance: Oversight Systems has released the results from its 5th annual survey [link to PDF] on SOX compliance. According to the results, companies are no longer seeing incremental benefits from SOX, and they are looking to reduce both costs and the number of key controls. At the same time, they want a better way to fight fraud. M&A: A KPMG survey of 160 U.S. and European companies, titled “Doing Deals in Tough Times,” identifies five key ways that successful corporate M&A teams are organizing and implementing their deals. The KPMG research also examines organizational characteristics such as team size, reporting structure, skill composition, recruiting practices, tools and training, and compensation. Fraud Investigations: With four out of five companies suffering from fraud in the past five years, it is no surprise that fraud investigations are a common occurrence in the business world. In the latest issue of the Kroll Global Fraud Report, Kroll investigators pull back the curtain on the investigative process to explore the complexities that can often prevent companies from responding in a timely and efficient manner to these serious incidents. Governance Fellowships: To support excellence in nonprofit board leadership, the firm BoardWalk Consulting is offering up to six fellowships that will allow a select group of nonprofit trustees to attend a compelling short course at Harvard Business School on "Governing for Nonprofit Excellence." The deadline for preliminary expressions of interest is August 11, 2008. Click here for more information on the course itself and the firm’s process for selecting BoardWalk Governance Fellows. Class Action Filings: Cornerstone Research and Stanford University Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse have released their Securities Class Action Filings: 2008 Mid-Year Assessment. The report indicates the level of litigation remained high. A majority of the filings contain subprime-related allegations. The report clearly offers more evidence for the ongoing fallout from the subprime crisis. The full report can be downloaded at http://securities.stanford.edu or http://www.cornerstone.com. Disclosure I: The National Investor Relations Institute has released the results of its recent Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) study. The project involved a series of 30 executive interviews with senior IR professionals, both corporate IROs and counselors, to understand the impact of Reg FD on the practice of investor relations in the eight years since its introduction in 2000. Disclosure II: Twenty eight percent of large public companies are not fully meeting the disclosure requirements for tax reserve estimates required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board rule known as FIN 48. Seigel & Associates LLC analyzed the annual reports of more than 600 companies whose revenues exceed $2 billion. The complete report can be accessed at http://www.seigel-llc.com. Author Notes AlixPartners LLP, the global business advisory firm, has named Managing Director Frederick A. Crawford, 45, as chief executive officer. He joined the firm in 2004, and has led several major client engagements, including serving as chief restructuring officer of a major global retailer where he helped improve operating earnings 70% and add $2.7 billion in shareholder value. He is the co-author of the New York Times best-selling book, "The Myth of Excellence," which details his research on consumer motivation and corporate strategic response. Alice Korngold, an expert in strengthening nonprofit governance, has updated her firm’s website. Visit http://www.korngoldconsulting.com for briefing materials and other informative resources for leadership development strategies for both corporations and nonprofits. Randy Thurman has been named executive chairman of CardioNet Inc., a wireless medical technology company. He most recently served as chairman and CEO of VIASYS Healthcare Inc., a medical technology company that was acquired by Cardinal Health in June 2007 for $1.5 billion. Thurman’s article, “The Unique Nature of Small Company Boards,” appeared in the Summer 2000 issue of Directors & Boards and was spotlighted again for special mention in the 30th Anniversary issue of Directors & Boards published in 2006. Carpenter Moore, a wholly owned subsidiary of The NASDAQ OMX Group Inc., has been ranked the No. 1 directors and officers (D&O) insurance broker for public companies, according to the latest Towers Perrin Directors and Officers Liability Survey. Earlier this year, Carpenter Moore released its first global D&O Benchmarking Report that offers unique data on the true cost of D&O insurance for public companies in different industries. For more information, visit http://www.nasdaq.net/PublicPages/InsuranceAgency.aspx. Grant Thornton LLP, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd., one of the six global, accounting, tax and business advisory organizations, took first place in the Public Accounting Report’s second quarter audit rankings. The ranking marks the first time one of the four largest accounting firms has not won PAR’s quarterly audit ranking. To achieve this ranking, Grant Thornton placed second in net gains in SEC clients, net gain revenue audited, net gain assets audited, and third in net gain audit fees for the second quarter. Back to the Top Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2008, MLR Holdings LLC. |
|||