Volume 2, Number 4 • April 2005

Are you reading a pass along copy? Get your own FREE subscription. To unsubscribe, please click HERE  and send a blank email.  You will be automatically unsubscribed.









Directors & Boards


Robert H. Rock
Publisher

James Kristie
Editor

Lisa Cody
Chief Financial Officer

David Shaw
Publishing Director

Scott Chase
Advertising Sales Director


1845 Walnut Street
Suite 900
Philadelphia, PA 19103
+1 (215) 567-3200


The Directors & Boards e-Briefing is produced by GRID Media LLC.





From Jim Kristie   |   Article of the Month   |   Columnist
Reader Profile   |   Research   |   News  



What Is the Job of a Director?
A proposition elegant in its simplicity: Choose the right CEO, and then make sure he or she doesn’t “muck things up.”



When I became editor of Directors & Boards in 1981, an executive who shall remain nameless -- simply because after a quarter of a century I can’t remember who it was (oh, how the memory goes with age!) -- said to me, “Jim, the job of a director is to make sure the right guy is running the company.”

My reaction was: That can’t be right. Surely there is a whole lot more to being a director and doing what a director does. Well, the subsequent years in the governance trenches have tempered my initial recoiling at that fellow’s board philosophy. I’ve come to the realization that maybe he was right.

And here’s why: If you get this big job done -- i.e., making sure that the right person (as my board expert would say it today) is in the top spot -- then everything else is likely to fall right in line in a good way for the board, company, and shareholders.

Not that you don’t have continuing concerns and a whole raft of ongoing duties and accountabilities. But when you’ve done the hard work of getting into the corner office a CEO in whose character and capability you have utter confidence, then you’ve done job one of being a director.

Master banker and board leader Walter Wriston put this to me in another way when I interviewed him in 1986, two years after he had retired as chairman of Citicorp. He and his board went through a delicate succession process. I was chatting him up for the 10th anniversary special issue of Directors & Boards, and when I raised the issue of the board’s role in succession planning, he stated unequivocally, “The first duty of a director is to fire the CEO if he isn’t performing. When I was recruiting directors for Citicorp, that’s the first thing I said: ‘Your primary function is to kick me off if we’re mucking it up.’”

More wisdom on picking the right person for the top spot will be found in the Boardroom Briefing on “CEO Succession Planning.” This is the second in a series of special reports jointly produced by Directors & Boards and the National Association of Corporate Directors. See below for further details.

And for more wisdom from Wriston, who died earlier this year, I’ll share with you a copy of my interview. As with the Lewis Platt article referenced in the last issue (which many D&B e-Briefing readers requested), the Wriston interview preceded the digitalization of our article archives. But I have a PDF of an abridged version of the interview, which is being featured in the Second Quarter 2005 D&B, mailing to subscribers in mid-April. Please e-mail me with your request. And all D&B subscribers should keep an eye on their mailbox for a copy of the Boardroom Briefing soon to arrive.

Jim Kristie is the editor and associate publisher of Directors & Boards.

Back to the Top

Research to Do Before Joining a Board
While no amount of due diligence can avoid every problem, the more you do, the better you are likely to feel about your ultimate decision.

By Beverly Behan

Serving on a board of directors today means investing more time and effort in the board’s affairs than ever before. Consequently, before saying “yes” to a board invitation prospective directors are doing more due diligence than ever.

What follows are some things you can do to get greater insights about any board that you are invited to serve on -- ideas that have been helpful to other directors in making board choices.

Conversations with the CEO and Other Board Members
The concept of an “interview” to join a board was unheard of in earlier days, when boards consisted of close friends of the CEO, who casually invited them to become a director. Today, most nominating and governance committees, which now lead board recruitment efforts, would never consider recommending a director candidate without having that candidate meet with the CEO, the lead director (if there is one), the chairs of the nominating and governance committees, and sometimes other board members as well.

These discussions are an equally important, if not more important, part of your own due diligence in deciding whether or not to join this board.

• Discussions with the Chief Executive Officer. Your conversation with the CEO will probably be pivotal to your decision. Most directors decide whether or not to join a board based on their impressions of corporate leadership. Your conversation will undoubtedly focus on the CEO’s vision for the company -- key strategic objectives and challenges.

  
[Click Here to Read the Entire Article]

Back to the Top




Announcing a New Board Member
Companies should treat the appointment of a new director as an opportunity to convey a strategic message to the market.



By Ron Culp and Naomi Gitlin


Given the ongoing, increasing focus on corporate governance, new director appointments are important news. Often, companies communicate this news directly to shareholders and other stakeholders -- employees, customers, the media -- going beyond what’s required in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 8-K.

Why? A new director appointment may be an opportunity for a board to emphasize its enhanced independence (or accountability), reassure shareholders, or infuse the board with fresh, new thinking.

Initial determinants
A new board member announcement can be incorporated into external and internal communications vehicles. Which vehicles are selected depends on several factors, including:

Backdrop: What is the context surrounding the new appointment? Is an outgoing board member being replaced? Is the board expanding in size?
 
Existing Plan: What is the agreed-upon communications plan -- including goals -- for announcing the new director, and how will it be integrated into the existing communications program?
 
Plan Approvals: Is the “vetting” process complete? Has the plan been reviewed and approved both by the company’s public relations and investor relations staff and by their counterparts from the company where the director may hold a management position?

Key Messages: What are the key messages the company wants to deliver with the appointment of this new director? Who are the key audiences? Which communication vehicles can best send those messages?
 
[Click Here to Read the Entire Article]

Back to the Top

Robert W. MacDonald
CTWConsulting, LLC


Editor's note:  Each month, we ask a Directors & Boards reader to comment on critical issues facing directors today.  If you'd like to participate in this section in the future, please email Scott Chase


As an independent director and audit committee member for three large companies, what value -- if any -- has Sarbanes-Oxley brought to the corporate governance venue?

It has always been my belief that Sarbanes-Oxley would be no more than an inconvenience to the well-run and effectively governed company. After all, when boiled down, Sarbanes-Oxley only asks that a company report correct numbers, have proven systems to make sure the numbers are accurate and information regarding the company is provided to everyone in the same manner and timing. These are certainly laudable objectives.  For the most part, my experience has confirmed the initial feeling. Certainly Sarbanes-Oxley is an inconvenience for everyone involved with compliance, but it has forced even the best-run companies to take a serious look at the way their business is conducted and accounted for. I have seen management, accounting, the audit function and information technology areas go deeper than ever before in understanding and verifying the performance of responsibilities to management and the shareholders. In the vast majority of the cases no errors or wrongdoing have been discovered by this Sarbanes-Oxley audit exercise, but potential “weaknesses” in the process have been identified and corrected. This is a positive for all concerned.

[Click Here to Read the Entire Article]

Back to the Top


Deloitte & Touche LLP Study Examines Causes Behind Worst Market Losses of the Last Decade

'Disarming the Value Killers' Outlines Strategies for CEOs and Boards to Effectively Mitigate Risk


The loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in shareholder value during the past 10 years might have been mitigated substantially if some organizations approached risk management differently, according to a new study by Deloitte & Touche LLP, one of the nation's leading professional services firms. 

"Disarming the Value Killers. A Risk Management Study" reveals that sudden and dramatic drops in share price may often be the result of a failure to monitor and manage the interaction of diverse sources of risk. 

Specifically, Deloitte & Touche examined the ten-year stock performance of 1000 of the world's largest companies in 2003. Almost one-half of the companies studied suffered declines in share prices of more than 20 percent in a one-month period, relative to the Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index, the study revealed. By the end of 2003, approximately one-quarter of these companies had still not recovered their lost market value. And, another quarter of the companies needed more than a year for their share prices to recover. 

External factors such as the Asian financial crisis or the bursting of the tech bubble clearly precipitated certain losses. However, the most dramatic drops in stock price may have been the result of ineffective risk management. The study identified four broad risk categories that companies must manage: strategic, external, operational and financial risk. Among the key findings, of the 100 companies that experienced the greatest decline in share price over a one-month period: 

¶ Only 37 companies apparently suffered stock losses due primarily to financial risk, which is less than half the number of companies that sustained losses due to strategic, external and operational risks.

¶ Shortfalls in demand appeared to be a leading cause of strategic risk-related losses.

¶ Cost overrun and poor operating controls were the leading occurrences of potential operational risks.

"An unexpected finding from the study," commented Rick Funston, Deloitte & Touche's Enterprise Risk Management Leader, "is that there were many instances where companies experienced two or more types of risk working in combination. Management has to look at risk across the enterprise. Those responsible for protecting shareholder value really have to take what I call a 'board's-eye' view of risk."

"We have observed a tendency to silo the issues and possibly ignore the interdependencies among the major forms of risk," said Mark Layton, Global Managing Partner, Enterprise Risk Services Practice at Deloitte. "Management should regularly examine the 'what if' scenarios, especially those situations where two things go wrong at the same time. Companies with strategic flexibility have a significant advantage in this era of heightened risk." 

Most losses in the study appeared to have occurred due to a failure to correctly anticipate, hedge against, and manage diverse risks. Today, both CEOs and their boards must recognize risk management as an imperative. Sarbanes-Oxley and other new regulatory disclosure requirements are a start; however, they do not guarantee effective risk management. Companies must have managers who can look ahead, identify the information they will need to make sound decisions and be flexible enough to pursue alternate strategies. 

A pdf of the study is available here

Back to the Top


April 26-29, 2005
The J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University will host a conference on "Corporate Governance: Effectiveness and Accountability in the Boardroom," designed to "energize" a director's thinking and "empower you with new tools, concepts and strategies to meet the new challenges of your critical governance role." Visit http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/execed or call 1-847-467-7000 for registration information.

April 28-29, 2005
Loyola University Chicago Family Business Center will present "Developing Leaders: The Keys to Successful Leadership on the Board, in Management, and in the Family." Sessions include "Non-Family CEOs - Leading When You're Not a Family Member" and "Board Leadership in a Family Firm - What's Different?" Brian France, chairman and CEO of Nascar, is a keynote speaker. Call 1-800-424-3981 for registration information, or visit http://www.sba.luc.edu/familybusiness.

May 31-June 3, 2005
Stanford Business School Corporate Governance Program: A three-day session to help board members increase their understanding of the mechanics, strategies, and best practices of board membership. Evaluating corporate strategy, understanding incentive compensation, and optimizing group work to achieve effective oversight are topics on the agenda. For more information, call 1-866-542-2205 or visit http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/exed/cgp.

June 7, 2005
Boardroom Consultants, a leader in executive and board search and governance consulting, will conduct its Third Annual Institute on Board/Committee Effectiveness. Its past events have attracted top CEOs and directors for provocative and thought-leading sessions. for more information, visit http://www.boardroomconsultants.com or call 212-328-0440.

June 9, 2005
"Leading with Creativity and Conviction" is the theme of the Ninth Annual Wharton Leadership Conference being held at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. This one-day intensive conference will be devoted to exchanging idea about how senior executives can engage in creative leadership for innovation and sustainable growth. It will be led by Peter Capelli, director of the Wharton Center for Human Resources, and Michael Useem, director of the Wharton Center for Leadership and Change Management. Conference agenda and information is available at http://leadership.wharton.upenn.edu/l_change/conferences/conf_060204.shtml.


June 19-21, 2005
The 11th annual Directors' College at Stanford University. Confirmed speakers include Richard Breeden, former SEC chairman now serving as monitor of WorldCom and Hollinger; Steve Cutler, head of the SEC's enforcement division; Joseph Grundfest, Stanford Law School professor and former SEC commissioner; Charles Munger, vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway; and Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google. For program details and to register online go to http://www.directorscollege.com.

Back to the Top


Boardroom Briefing:  CEO Succession Planning

The Directors & Boards/National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) co-sponsored Boardroom Briefing on CEO Succession Planning is in the mail.  You can view a .pdf copy here.

Author News


Speaking of CEO succession, as we have been doing in this edition of the e-Briefing, Office Depot Inc. went after D&B author Steve Odland to be its new chairman and CEO. Odland has been  chairman, president and CEO of AutoZone Inc. since January 2001. He was the author of the lead article in D&B's Fourth Quarter 2004 issue titled, "The Critical Difference." In Odland's words, "The foundation for corporate governance is a commitment to ethical behavior." Click here for a PDF copy of this thought-leading commentary by one of Corporate America's young and dynamic leaders.

Congratulations to D&B author James Mintz on celebrating the 10th anniversary of his firm, James Mintz Group Inc. Headquartered in New York, the firm provides investigative services to boards, corporate counsel, and a company's outside legal and financial advisers -- http://www.mintzgroup.com. Jim Mintz first appeared in D&B in 1996 with an advisory, "Background Checking on Board Candidates," and more recently with this board alert, "19 Things Executives Don't Want You to Know" (Fourth Quarter 2003). Look for another advisory by Jim and his colleagues later this year in the pages of D&B.

A few D&B internal staffing notes: Chairman and Publisher Robert Rock has joined the board of advisors of the Center for Law and Economics at the University of Pennsylvania -- http://www.law.upenn.edu/ile. The Institute is a national leader in scholarship, teaching, and intellectual exchange regarding the economic analysis of legal issues.

Welcome to Sadye Vogel, who joins the publishing staff to provide sales and marketing support to D&B and another journal published by parent company MLR Holdings LLC, Family Business -- http://www.familybusinessmagazine.com. Sadye is a recent graduate of Temple University's School of Communications and Theater. Molly Reilly has joined the staff as an intern until her graduation this spring from St. Joseph's University as an English major. And welcome back to Kelly McCarthy, our former associate editor, who rejoins the journal to edit the Directors Roster. She succeeds Martin Porter, who has skillfully overseen the Roster for the past decade and who has embarked on outside entrepreneurial ventures. The return of this talented researcher and writer is a fortuitous development for our expansion plans for the Directors Roster. More news on that to come.

New Directors Roster Additions

We present a preview of six of the directors to be featured in our next Directors Roster, appearing in the Third Quarter 2005 edition of Directors & Boards.  Edited by
Kelly McCarthy.

Countrywide Financial Corp. 
Kathleen Brown
Managing Director, Head of West Coast Region
Goldman Sachs & Co.


In present position since 2003. Joined Goldman Sachs in 2001, where until 2003 she managed a $2.5 billion portfolio in its private wealth management group. Previously held various executive management positions at Bank of America Corp., including president of the private bank. From 1991-1994 served as treasurer of the state of California, responsible for a $26 billion investment portfolio and in 2004 was the Democratic Party nominee for governor. Formerly was with the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP.

Countrywide is a financial services holding company. Revenues are $9 billion. Goldman Sachs is an international investment, banking, securities and investment firm. Revenues are $30 billion.


[Click Here to Read More Roster Listings]
 
Back to the Top


Directors & Boards e-Briefing is a monthly service of Directors & Boards. All contents copyright 2005, MLR Holdings LLC.